Skip to main content

The Effect of Patient Characteristics on Acupuncture Treatment Outcomes

Buy Article:

$57.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Objectives:

To optimally select chronic pain patients for different treatments, as it is of interest to identify patient characteristics that might moderate treatment effect. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of possible moderators on the effect of acupuncture treatment using a large data set.

Methods:

We used data from an individual patient data meta-analysis of high-quality randomized trials of acupuncture for chronic headache and migraine, osteoarthritis, and back, neck, and shoulder pain. Using meta-analytic trial-level and patient-level regression analyses, we explored the impact of 5 documented patient characteristics (patients’ age at baseline, sex, pain duration, baseline pain severity and baseline psychological distress) on the effect of acupuncture.

Results:

A total of 39 trials met the inclusion criteria: 25 use sham-acupuncture controls (n = 7097) and 25 non-acupuncture controls (n = 16,041). Of the 5 patient characteristics analyzed, only baseline pain severity was found to potentially moderate the treatment effect of acupuncture, with patients reporting more severe pain at baseline experiencing more benefit from acupuncture compared to either sham-control or non-acupuncture control. Baseline psychological distress showed small treatment moderating effects, and results for sex were inconsistent. There was no strong evidence that age or duration of pain influenced the response to acupuncture.

Discussion:

Of 5 patient characteristics tested, we found only baseline severity of pain to potentially moderate the effect of acupuncture treatment. For clinical practice, the evidence from this analysis does not justify stratifying chronic pain patients into subgroups that should or should not receive acupuncture on the basis of these 5 characteristics. Future acupuncture trials should assess other potentially important effect moderators.

Keywords: acupuncture; chronic pain; effect moderators; meta-analysis

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 2: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 3: Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire 4: Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton 5: TUM Medical School, Institute of General Practice, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany 6: Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK 7: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute and University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Publication date: 01 May 2019

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content