Skip to main content

Open Access Case management of malaria in Swaziland, 2011–2015: on track for elimination?

Objective: To assess adherence to malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines (2010 and 2014) in all health care facilities in Swaziland between 2011 and 2015.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study involving all health care facilities that diagnosed and managed malaria cases in Swaziland. Patients' age, sex, diagnosis method and type of treatment were analysed.

Results: Of 1981 records for severe and uncomplicated malaria analysed, 56% of cases were uncomplicated and 14% had severe malaria. The type of malaria was not recorded for 30% of cases. Approximately 71% of cases were confirmed by rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) alone, 3% by microscopy alone and 26% by both RDT and microscopy. Of the uncomplicated cases, 93% were treated with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) alone, 5% with quinine alone and 2% with AL and quinine. Amongst the severe cases, 11% were treated with AL alone, 44% with quinine alone and 45% with AL and quinine. For severe malaria, clinics and health centres prescribed AL alone more often than hospitals (respectively 13%, 12% and 4%, P = 0.03).

Conclusion: RDTs and/or microscopy results are used at all facilities to inform treatment. Poor recording of malaria type causes difficulties in assessing the prescription of antimalarial drugs.

Keywords: SORT IT; Swaziland; malaria case management; malaria elimination

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Swaziland, Mbabane, Swaziland 2: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya 3: National Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland 4: World Health Organization (WHO), Swaziland Country Office, Mbabane, Swaziland 5: National Institute for Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China 6: Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya 7: National Tuberculosis Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland 8: WHO, African Regional Office and Inter-Country Support Team, Asmara, Eritrea 9: Operational Research Unit, Operational Centre Brussels, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg

Publication date: 25 April 2018

More about this publication?
  • Public Health Action (PHA), The Union's quarterly Open Access journal, welcomes the submission of articles on operational research. It publishes high-quality scientific research on health services, providing new knowledge on how to improve access, equity, quality and efficiency of health systems and services.

    The Editors will consider any manuscript reporting original research on quality improvements, cost-benefit analysis, legislation, training and capacity building, with a focus on all relevant areas of public health (e.g. infection control, nutrition, TB, HIV, vaccines, smoking, COVID-19, microbial resistance, outbreaks etc).

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • Public Health Action
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content