Incentives in Best of N Contests: Quasi-Simpson's Paradox in Tennis
Simpson's Paradox is a statistical quirk where an apparent correlation of variables is reversed when the variables are combined. We investigate tennis' unique “best of N” scoring system for evidence of Simpson's Paradox among certain players who win more points than their
opponent but lose the overall match. Using data from more than 61,000 professional tennis matches over the course of 21 years, we find about 4.5% of matches exhibit such characteristics, providing insight into incentive effects derived from tennis' scoring system, (sub-)conscious strategic
decisions by players, and player-level traits that may be relevant to match outcomes. Practical implications in connection with sport integrity and narrow aspects of the sports gambling market are also discussed.
Keywords: INCENTIVES; SCORING SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL QUIRKS; TENNIS
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 December 2013
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content