Comparison of a rapid visual and a strip transect technique for censusing reef fish assemblages
Two visual census techniques frequently employed for quantifying coral reef fish assemblages, the rapid visual technique (RVT) and the strip transect technique (STT), were compared in terms of precision, observer bias, and species enumeration. Spearman rank correlation coefficients calculated between replicate RVT censuses were lower than for STT censuses, indicating that the RVT was less precise. The correlation coefficients for RVT censuses conducted by the same observer were greater than those for censuses conducted by different observers. Observer bias may be evident in the RVT because the order in which species are noticed is critical. Since there were no significant differences between the number of species recorded in each STT census and in the corresponding RVT census, the number of censuses required to assess species composition was equal for the two techniques. The correlation between averaged RVT and STT censuses was statistically significant. Both the RVT and the STT are valid visual census techniques. When quantitative estimates of abundance are desired, the STT must be used. When available field time is minimal and the main objective is to qualitatively characterize fish assemblages so that sites can be distinguished and compared on that basis, the RVT is more cost-effective.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: July 1, 1986
More about this publication?
- The Bulletin of Marine Science is dedicated to the dissemination of high quality research from the world's oceans. All aspects of marine science are treated by the Bulletin of Marine Science, including papers in marine biology, biological oceanography, fisheries, marine affairs, applied marine physics, marine geology and geophysics, marine and atmospheric chemistry, and meteorology and physical oceanography.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites