Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:15:23.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tail-Biting in Mink (Mustela Vison) is Influenced by Age at Removal From the Mother

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

G J Mason
G J Mason*
Affiliation:
Sub-department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that male mink (Mustela vison) removed from their mothers at seven weeks of age develop more tail-biting than males left with their mothers until six months. Mink in the wild do not damage their own pelts in this way, and such behaviour may well be an indication of chronic stress.

The aim of this experiment was to investigate further the causes of tail-biting by considering female young as well as male, and by lowering the age at which the late-weaned ‘ mink were separated from their mother to 11 weeks, by which age their period of socialization should be complete. This was to generate results of more practical use to farmers, who cannot leave all young with their mothers until six months of age for reasons of space. Mink removed from their mothers at seven or eleven weeks of age did indeed differ in the incidence of tail-biting. Early-weaned ‘females were more likely than late-weaned females to have bitten their tails at six months of age. A similar result was evident as a trend for both sexes at ten months. Furthermore, at this age, some animals ‘ tail tips were completely bald and such animals were all early-weaned.

Where provided with plastic drinker dishes, early-weaned animals were also more likely to chew these. Thus weaning age had long-lasting effects on a number of oral behaviour patterns. These results suggest that young animals predisposed to tail-bite might be diverted by the provision of other objects to chew, and that if problems of over-crowding are avoided, leaving mink kits with their mothers until 11 weeks might improve their welfare.

Keywords

animal welfaregroomingminkself-directed behaviourtail-bitingweaning
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , November 1994 , pp. 305 - 311
Copyright
© 1994 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Zoology, South Paries Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

References

Birks, JDS 1984 Mink. In MacDonald, D (ed) Encyclopaedia of Mammals pp 116–117. George Allen & Unwin: LondonGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J 1988 A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. Routledge: LondonGoogle Scholar
Dunstone, N 1993 The Mink. T & A D Poyser: LondonGoogle Scholar
Fox, M W 1968 Introduction: The concepts of normal and abnormal behavior. In Fox, M W (ed) Abnormal Behavior in Animals pp 1–5. Saunders: LondonGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A F and Broom, D M 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Bailliere-Tindall: LondonGoogle Scholar
Gerell, R 1970 Home ranges and movements of the mink (Mustela vison Shreber) in southern Sweden. Oikos 21: 160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, F F and Bailey, E D 1969 The effect of early weaning on the sexual behavior and reproductive success of ranch mink. Journal of Mammalogy 50: 742–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B L and Hart, L A 1985 Canine and Feline Behavioral Therapy. Lea & Febiger PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
Heller, K E, Houbak, B and Jeppesen, L L 1988 Stress during the mother-infant separation in ranch mink. Behavioural Processes 17: 217–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houbak, B and Jeppesen, L L 1987 Adfaerd i forbindelse med fravaenning hos mink (in Danish) pp 134-142. Faglig arsberetning DPGoogle Scholar
Isaacson, R L and Gispen, W H 1990 Neuropeptides and the issue of stereotypy and behaviour. In Cooper, S J and Dourish, C T (eds) Neurobiology of Stereotyped Behaviour pp 117–141. Clarendon: OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen, L L and Falkenberg, H 1990 Effect of play balls on pelt biting, behaviour and levels of stress in ranch mink. Scientifur 14: 179–186Google Scholar
Joergensen, G 1984 Mink Production. Scientifur: FoulumGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, G 1988 Genetics and evolution of tailbiting by mink. In Murphy, D B and Hunter, D B (eds) Biology, Pathology and Genetics of Fur-bearing Animals pp 503–505. Unpublished proceedings of the IVth International Scientific Congress of Furbearing Animals: TorontoGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, G 1989 Genetics and evolution of tail-biting by mink. Fur Rancher 69: 5–6Google Scholar
de Jonge, G 1991 Staart - en pelsbijten, efelijkheid en milieu. De pelsdierenhouder, September 1991 (in Dutch): 277–280Google Scholar
de Jonge, G, Carlstead, K and Wiepkema, P R 1986 The Welfare of Ranch Mink (Translated from Dutch). COVP issue No 08, Het Spelderholt: Beekbergen, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, A H 1951 The Mink in Health and Disease. Fur Trade Journal of Canada: TorontoGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, I M 1987 Fears, Phobias and Rituals - Panic, Anxiety and their Disorders. Oxford University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Martin, P 1984 The meaning of weaning. Animal Behaviour 32: 1257–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J 1992 Individual Differences in the Stereotypies of Caged Mink Unpublished PhD thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J 1994 The influence of weight, sex, birthdate and maternal age on the growth of weaning mink. Journal of Zoology 233: 203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D 1987 Catlore. Jonathan Cape: LondonGoogle Scholar
de Passillé, A M B, Metz, J H M, Mekking, P and Wiepkema, P R 1992 Does drinking milk stimulate sucking in young calves? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, R P 1967 The mink: a short outline of general management. Journal of the Institute of Animal Technicians 18: 66–79Google Scholar
Rutter, M 1981 Maternal Deprivation Reassessed, 2nd edition. Penguin: Harmandsworth, MiddlesexGoogle Scholar
Schneider, R R and Hunter, D B 1992 Nursing sickness in mink. Scientifur 16: 239–242Google Scholar
Siegel, S and Castellan, N J 1988 Nonparametric Statistics. McGraw-Hill: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Zar, J H 1984 Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NTGoogle Scholar