An Investigation of Definitions of Experimental Vaping among Youth
Objectives: Identifying which youth are experimenting with vaping could aid the development and evaluation of targeted media campaigns and research and surveillance activities. In this study, we sought to identify behavioral definitions that best differentiate youth experimenters and established vapers. Methods: We conducted an online survey with a non-probability sample of 1500 youth aged 13-17 who reported ever vaping. Based on recency and lifetime vaping, we constructed 12 definitions of experimenters versus more established or recent users. We examined how well each definition discriminated between experimenters and established/recent users based on correlates (eg, vaping dependence, harm perceptions) using multivariate tests of mean differences, controlling for multiple variables, and ratios of between- to within-group variance. Results: Four definitions best distinguished between experimenters and more established/recent users (ie, had greater Hotelling T2 statistics for the multivariate tests and higher ratios of between- to within-group variance). Three of these 4 identified experimenters as those with no past 30-day vaping. Conclusion: Ever vapers are not a monolithic group. Our results suggest that past 30-day use is an important criterion for distinguishing experimenters from more established users. Understanding nuances between user groups could lead to greater differentiation among ever vapers and aid campaign targeting.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: July 2020
More about this publication?
- Tobacco Regulatory Science (Electronic ISSN 2333-9748) is a rigorously peer-reviewed online scientific journal for the dissemination of research relevant to the regulation of tobacco products. The journal content includes a broad array of research domains, including chemistry, biology, behavior, community, and population-level surveillance and epidemiology, as well as knowledge syntheses (eg, meta-analyses or state-of-the-art reviews) and analytic modeling. All articles describe the policy relevance of the research outcomes. Given the global nature of tobacco regulation, particularly as a result of international and national policies, Tobacco Regulatory Science publishes high quality research that is relevant to global regulatory needs and requirements. Tobacco Regulatory Science is published electronically 6 times per year.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Review Board
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites