Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Free Content Consensus or dissensus? Analysing people's perceptions of the necessities of life in Finland

Download Article:
(PDF 204.5 kb)
The aim of this study is to analyse whether or not people are in consensus on what the necessities of life are in Finland. Consensus is analysed through two criteria: a public oriented view on the necessities and agreement between individuals. The study utilises a Finnish postal survey from 2015 where people were asked about the necessity of 23 items. The results suggest that individual views are shaped by personal circumstances and a fully public-oriented view cannot be established. Further, the respondents did not seem to agree on what are necessities. This implies that the minimum living standard could not be established consensually.

8 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics


Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Email: [email protected]

Publication date: October 2018

This article was made available online on July 20, 2018 as a Fast Track article with title: "Consensus or dissensus? Analysing people’s perceptions of the necessities of life in Finland".

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more