The new evidence-based policy: public participation between ‘hard evidence’ and democracy in practice
Debates about evidence-based policy (EBP) were revived in the UK in the 2010s in the context of civil service reform and changing practices of policy making, including institutionalisation of public participation in science policy making.
Aims and objectives:
This paper aims to explore this revival of interest in EBP in the context of the Government-funded public participation programme Sciencewise, which supports and promotes public dialogues in science policy making. It is based on in-depth ethnographic study of the programme during 2013, considering the impacts on Sciencewise practices and working understandings of engaging in the EBP debate. There is a particular focus on the advantages and disadvantages of categorising public participation as a source of evidence-based policy as opposed to presenting participation as a democratic act which is separate from discussions of EBP.
At different times Sciencewise actors moved between these stances in order to gain credibility and attention for their work, and to situate the outcomes of public participation processes in a broader policy context. In some instances the presentation of outputs from public participation processes as legitimate evidence for policy gave them greater influence and enriched broader discussions about the meaning and practice of open policy. However, it also frequently led to their dismissal on methodological grounds, inhibiting serious engagement with their outputs and challenging internal frameworks for evaluation and learning.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: University of East Anglia, UK
Publication date: May 2020
This article was made available online on November 25, 2019 as a Fast Track article with title: "The new evidence-based policy: public participation between ‘hard evidence’ and democracy in practice".
Evidence & Policy is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to comprehensive and critical assessment of the relationship between research evidence and the concerns of policy makers and practitioners, as well as researchers.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Policy Press journals homepage
- Evidence & Policy fast track articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites