Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Erring on the Side of Hidden Harm: The Granting of Domestic Violence Restraining Orders

Buy Article:

$24.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

In deciding whether to enter a domestic violence restraining order, many judges think about their careers in addition to the merits of the cases before them. While the damage to parent–child relationships and to children's mental health caused by the overzealous entering of restraining orders is seldom if ever reported by the media, the harm caused by overtly violent acts following the failure to enter restraining orders most certainly is. In regards to restraining orders, the phrase "erring on the side of caution" is often invoked. It is more accurate, however, to characterize the judge's behavior as "erring on the side of hidden harm." Rather than judges, juries—one time judicial actors—should decide when domestic violence restraining orders are warranted.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; JUDICIAL BEHAVIOR; JUDICIAL BIAS; RESTRAINING ORDERS

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: April 1, 2010

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more