Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Open Access A Commentary on Hornsveld et al. (2011): A Valid Test of Resource Development and Installation? Absolutely Not

Download Article:
 Download
(PDF 66.8 kb)
 
Researchers have published evidence supporting both the “working memory” and the “REM/Orienting Response” hypotheses as mechanisms underlying the documented treatment effects of EMDR on patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Hornsveld et al. (2011) provide additional evidence of the impact of eye movements (EMs) on aspects of positive memory recall, but overstate their findings relevance to resource development and installation (RDI: Korn & Leeds, 2002) and to the interhemispheric interaction hypothesis (Propper & Christman, 2008). Most likely multiple mechanisms underlie the observed effects of EMDR and RDI. The needed RDI test is to randomly assign patients with Disorders of Extreme Stress not Otherwise Specified with measured coping difficulties to alternate conditions: one an RDI procedure without bilateral (or other distracting) sensory stimulation and one with bilateral EMs.

17 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: EMDR; RDI; REM/ORIENTING RESPONSE; RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION; WORKING MEMORY

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 November 2012

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of EMDR Practice and Research is no longer available to subscribers on Ingenta Connect. Please go to http://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgremdr to access your online subscription to Journal of EMDR Practice and Research.
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more