Skip to main content

More Claims in the Pollinator Debate

Buy Article:

$38.58 + tax (Refund Policy)

Recent reports have made various claims about the impact of neonicotinoids and fipronil on the health and well being of pollinators and, now, other non-target organisms. The crop protection industry continues to argue that the data that are used to show deleterious effects are flawed and it is poor weather conditions, the Varroa mite and viruses that are responsible. It is good to see that there are plans to design meaningful experiments to answer these difficult questions, but disappointing to see several groups continuing to use the 'loss of bees' story to seek funding for their work.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 August 2014

More about this publication?
  • An international journal covering the management of weeds, pests and diseases through chemistry, biology and biotechnology.
  • Information for Authors
  • International Pest Control
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content