Conceptualizing Resilience in Transformation Processes: Working with Context Resilience and Specifying Interrelated Systems in Bavaria’s Forest and Wood Use Systems
For a transition process linking previously unrelated systems thinking to be effective, it must mobilize diverse actors in support of transition pathways. In such circumstances, context resilience is a vital concept and an actor-oriented political ecology approach recommended.
This paper explores how “resilience” can be conceptualized in transformation processes. We focus on the German Advisory Council on Global Change’s (WBGU) call for a Great Societal Transformation and on two of the recommended measures, namely substitution and cascade use of wood. In the context of Bavaria’s forest industries, policies to promote cascade use and substitution interact with a complex web of actors, structures, practices, and expectations, best conceived of as two partially interrelated systems of forests and wood use. In these interrelated systems, we recommend use of an actor-oriented political ecology approach that will reveal the politics at work around narratives of resilience. Transformation processes are embedded in specific social, economic, political, ecological and spatial contexts, where resilience can have several meanings. We argue that the concept “context resilience” is needed when researching interrelated systems.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: January 1, 2017
GAIA is a peer-reviewed inter- and transdisciplinary journal for scientists and other interested parties concerned with the causes and analyses of environmental and sustainability problems and their solutions.
Environmental problems cannot be solved by one academic discipline. The complex natures of these problems require cooperation across disciplinary boundaries. Since 1991, GAIA has offered a well-balanced and practice-oriented forum for transdisciplinary research. GAIA offers first-hand information on state of the art environmental research and on current solutions to environmental problems. Well-known editors, advisors, and authors work to ensure the high quality of the contributions found in GAIA and a unique transdisciplinary dialogue – in a comprehensible style.
GAIA is an ISI-journal, listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Science Citation Index and in Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.
All contributions undergo a double-blind peer review.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites