Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Open Access Responsible resilience: Rekonstruktion der Normativität von Resilienz auf Basis einer responsiven Ethik

Download Article:
(HTML 66.7 kb)
(PDF 135.4 kb)
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Resilienz aus Sicht einer responsiven Ethik: Das bedeutet nicht nur, auf Herausforderungen zu reagieren, sondern vielmehr, sich von ihnen betreffen zu lassen und auf sie zu antworten. Durch diese Öffnung auf Andere und Anderes hin lassen wir uns in die Pflicht nehmen. Im Antwortgeben selbst liegt die normative Dimension einer Responsible resilience begründet.

Within many practical, professional and political fields, resilience has become a normative, barely questioned orientation principle, yet it has not been the subject of explicit reflection. The following considerations aim to contribute to closing this gap without assuming a dichotomy between the functional and the normative levels. Resilience is understood as a process whose focus is the response to upheaval and problems. The ability to respond, then, is the starting point from which the normative aspects of resilience can be more clearly brought out and connected to conceptual differences (simple and reflective resilience; specific and general resilience) within resilience discourse. This is grounded in Bernhard Waldenfels’ idea of responsive ethics. Our concept seeks to provide greater understanding of the term “responsible resilience” and bring up the normativity of resilience in a reflective, non-dichotomous way.
No References for this article.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Bernhard Waldenfels; adaptation; ethics; learning process; persistence; resilience; responsive ethics; responsiveness; social ethics; sustainability; transformation

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 2017

More about this publication?
  • GAIA is a peer-reviewed inter- and transdisciplinary journal for scientists and other interested parties concerned with the causes and analyses of environmental and sustainability problems and their solutions.

    Environmental problems cannot be solved by one academic discipline. The complex natures of these problems require cooperation across disciplinary boundaries. Since 1991, GAIA has offered a well-balanced and practice-oriented forum for transdisciplinary research. GAIA offers first-hand information on state of the art environmental research and on current solutions to environmental problems. Well-known editors, advisors, and authors work to ensure the high quality of the contributions found in GAIA and a unique transdisciplinary dialogue – in a comprehensible style.

    GAIA is an ISI-journal, listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Science Citation Index and in Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    All contributions undergo a double-blind peer review.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more