Skip to main content

Free Content Kommunale Nachhaltigkeit durch Organisationslernen?: Ein Plädoyer für Bescheidenheit Kommunale Nachhaltigkeit durch Organisationslernen?: Ein Plädoyer für Bescheidenheit

Organizational learning is often seen as an opportunity for local sustainability strategies. However, by making use of special views in organizational sociology, this paper argues that it will actually be very difficult to increase the ecological efficiency of local governments using the concepts of organizational learning. The challenge lies in the fact that organizations like local governments have certain dynamics that hinder environmental progress. For example, local governments are typically embedded in complex surroundings and cannot be independent in their decisions. Moreover, they tend to aim at achieving acceptance rather than at solving problems. Additionally, such organizations are characterized by relationships of power. The paper evaluates these conceptual considerations by looking at the decision making and implementation of Local Agenda 21 Processes, the Environmental Impact Assessment, as well as the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme. Returning to organizational sociology, the author concludes that organizational learning for sustainability is easier if the method of recursive reorganisation is applied because it can integrate the difficulties of organizational learning into the learning process.

Keywords: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT SCHEME; LOCAL AGENDA 21; LOCAL SUSTAINABILITY; ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING; RECURSIVE REORGANISATION

Language: German

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 January 2005

More about this publication?
  • GAIA is a peer-reviewed inter- and transdisciplinary journal for scientists and other interested parties concerned with the causes and analyses of environmental and sustainability problems and their solutions.

    Environmental problems cannot be solved by one academic discipline. The complex natures of these problems require cooperation across disciplinary boundaries. Since 1991, GAIA has offered a well-balanced and practice-oriented forum for transdisciplinary research. GAIA offers first-hand information on state of the art environmental research and on current solutions to environmental problems. Well-known editors, advisors, and authors work to ensure the high quality of the contributions found in GAIA and a unique transdisciplinary dialogue – in a comprehensible style.

    GAIA is an ISI-journal, listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Science Citation Index and in Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    All contributions undergo a double-blind peer review.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content