Skip to main content

Technik und gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz: Herausforderungen der Technikfolgenabschätzung

Buy Article:

$24.90 + tax (Refund Policy)

Modern societies have problems in coping with technological change. There is hardly an area of one's personal or professional life that is not dominated by technological applications. At the same time, however, people demonstrate clear preferences for a natural lifestyle without a strong dependence on a technological infrastructure. As a result of this gap between real life situation and personal preference, people search for orientations that can guide them through major lifestyle decisions, in particular about the desirable level of technology in their personal and social environment. These decisions are partly based on psychological mechanisms of perception and information processing, partly constructed by linking symbolic connotations to technologies. This alignment of cultural and psychological associations to human artefacts is an important element in the building of personal and social identity. For this reason, technology assessment cannot be confined to the task of estimating the potential consequences of technologies, but needs to include the personal and cultural associations that go hand in hand with the implications of technology's objective properties.

However, the valid assessment of the physical consequences is a needed part of technology assessment and also a necessary condition for an evaluation process, in which the symbols and values of the people affected are vital elements of an integrated assessment.

Keywords: EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGY; PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY; RISK ACCEPTANCE; RISK PERCEPTION; SOCIOLOGY OF TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 March 1993

More about this publication?
  • GAIA is a peer-reviewed inter- and transdisciplinary journal for scientists and other interested parties concerned with the causes and analyses of environmental and sustainability problems and their solutions.

    Environmental problems cannot be solved by one academic discipline. The complex natures of these problems require cooperation across disciplinary boundaries. Since 1991, GAIA has offered a well-balanced and practice-oriented forum for transdisciplinary research. GAIA offers first-hand information on state of the art environmental research and on current solutions to environmental problems. Well-known editors, advisors, and authors work to ensure the high quality of the contributions found in GAIA and a unique transdisciplinary dialogue – in a comprehensible style.

    GAIA is an ISI-journal, listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Science Citation Index and in Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    All contributions undergo a double-blind peer review.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content