Skip to main content

Anticipating Conflicts: Public Participation in Managing the Solid Waste Crisis

Buy Article:

$24.90 + tax (Refund Policy)

A major problem of environmental policy making is to anticipate potential conflicts among the major participants and to reach a suitable understanding or compromise that meets both competence vis-a-vis the decision problem and fairness vis-a-vis the affected population.

This paper introduces a novel model of public involvement in decisions about solid waste disposal in specific and environmental management in general. Structured in three consecutive steps, the model is based on the philosophy that stakeholders, experts, and citizens should each contribute to the environmental planning effort their particular concern and experience. In a first step, the research team elicits the values and criteria for assessing and evaluating policy options from all relevant stakeholders; in a second step, experts are asked to provide performance assessments for each option on each criterion; and in a third step, randomly selected citizens are given the opportunity to evaluate each option on the basis of the concerns and impacts revealed in the previous two steps. This involvement process is illustrated with an example about sewage sludge management.

Keywords: CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 March 1992

More about this publication?
  • GAIA is a peer-reviewed inter- and transdisciplinary journal for scientists and other interested parties concerned with the causes and analyses of environmental and sustainability problems and their solutions.

    Environmental problems cannot be solved by one academic discipline. The complex natures of these problems require cooperation across disciplinary boundaries. Since 1991, GAIA has offered a well-balanced and practice-oriented forum for transdisciplinary research. GAIA offers first-hand information on state of the art environmental research and on current solutions to environmental problems. Well-known editors, advisors, and authors work to ensure the high quality of the contributions found in GAIA and a unique transdisciplinary dialogue – in a comprehensible style.

    GAIA is an ISI-journal, listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Science Citation Index and in Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    All contributions undergo a double-blind peer review.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content