Systematic review of omalizumab for refractory clonal and non-clonal mast cell activation syndrome
Background:
Patients with mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) can be refractory to standard antimediator therapy. Alternative treatment options to reduce disease burden and improve quality of life are needed.
Objective:
To compile the evidence that supports the use of omalizumab for patients with refractory MCAS.
Methods:
Through a systematic review of the PubMed database, we compiled and analyzed the characteristics of patients with refractory MCAS, unresponsive to histamine 1 receptor antihistamines plus another antimediator agent (refractory MCAS), and who were treated with omalizumab. We categorized the clinical response to omalizumab as no, partial, or complete response.
Results:
We identified nine studies that described a total of 28 patients (median age, 48 years; males, 54%) with refractory MCAS. Twenty-one patients (75%) had nonclonal MCAS, and seven patients (25%) had clonal MCAS. The omalizumab dose ranged from 150 mg every 4 weeks to 300 mg every 3 weeks, with the most common dose being 150 mg every 2 weeks. Most patients had a partial response (61%), and five patients achieved a complete response. Omalizumab was successful in ameliorating anaphylaxis and allowed for discontinuation of systemic glucocorticoids in two of three patients. The response pattern was not influenced by sex or mast cell clonality, but a complete response was reported more commonly among receivers of a higher omalizumab dose (≥300 mg/month). No major adverse events were reported.
Conclusion:
The majority of patients with refractory MCAS reported in the literature had a reduction in mast cell mediator‐related symptoms with the addition of omalizumab.
Patients with mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) can be refractory to standard antimediator therapy. Alternative treatment options to reduce disease burden and improve quality of life are needed.
Objective:
To compile the evidence that supports the use of omalizumab for patients with refractory MCAS.
Methods:
Through a systematic review of the PubMed database, we compiled and analyzed the characteristics of patients with refractory MCAS, unresponsive to histamine 1 receptor antihistamines plus another antimediator agent (refractory MCAS), and who were treated with omalizumab. We categorized the clinical response to omalizumab as no, partial, or complete response.
Results:
We identified nine studies that described a total of 28 patients (median age, 48 years; males, 54%) with refractory MCAS. Twenty-one patients (75%) had nonclonal MCAS, and seven patients (25%) had clonal MCAS. The omalizumab dose ranged from 150 mg every 4 weeks to 300 mg every 3 weeks, with the most common dose being 150 mg every 2 weeks. Most patients had a partial response (61%), and five patients achieved a complete response. Omalizumab was successful in ameliorating anaphylaxis and allowed for discontinuation of systemic glucocorticoids in two of three patients. The response pattern was not influenced by sex or mast cell clonality, but a complete response was reported more commonly among receivers of a higher omalizumab dose (≥300 mg/month). No major adverse events were reported.
Conclusion:
The majority of patients with refractory MCAS reported in the literature had a reduction in mast cell mediator‐related symptoms with the addition of omalizumab.
Keywords: FcεRI expression; MCAS; anaphylaxis; biologic; histamine; immunoglobulin E; mast cell activation syndrome; non-clonal mast cell activation syndrome; omalizumab; refractory; therapy; tryptase
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: From the Section of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Medicine and Pediatrics, Pennsylvania State University School of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania and
Publication date: January 1, 2025
- Allergy and Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists.
The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma and by having the potential to directly impact the quality of patient care. AAP welcomes the submission of original works including peer-reviewed original research and clinical trial results. Additionally, as the official journal of the Eastern Allergy Conference (EAC), AAP will publish content from EAC poster sessions as well as review articles derived from EAC lectures.
Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
Articles marked "F" offer free full text for personal noncommercial use only.
The journal is indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Science Citation Index Expanded, plus the National Library of Medicine's PubMed service. - Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprint Requests
- Commercial level: Permission to use content
- www.JFoodAllergy.com
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content