Discrepancy in Conceptualizing Critical Thinking by Scholars and Secondary Students
Critical thinking has gained much attention in many countries over the past few decades; however, there is no clear definition of what it is due to the richness in meaning of the term ‘critical thinking’ and the ambiguity of the word ‘critical’. In spite of this, many scholars had contributed their conceptions of critical thinking, in which consists of skills and dispositional dimensions. The purpose of the current study was to investigate students conceptions of critical thinking. 480 Secondary 5 (Year 11) students in four Hong Kong secondary schools completed a questionnaire consisting of 40 descriptors of critical thinking. The quantitative data was conducted by principal component analysis (PCA). Results indicated that students conceived critical thinking as one dimension only, contrary to the two-dimensional conceptions of critical thinking from scholars. The results have important implications for teacher education as well as the successful implementation of Liberal Studies.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: May 1, 2019
More about this publication?
- Curriculum and Teaching is a bi-annual, refereed, international journal publishing original research. It uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites