Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Free Content In situ effects of selected preservatives on total carbon, nitrogen and metals collected in sediment traps

Download Article:
(PDF 764.8 kb)
The concentration and chemical composition of preservative or poison to use in sediment trap studies continue to present an important unresolved question. Past laboratory/field experiments designed to answer this question are difficult to interpret, because so-called analogs have been used instead of actual trap materials, which are compositionally complex.

This paper presents our results on the in situ effects of formalin, azide and mercuric ion on material collected in MULTITRAPS set at 100 and 300 m for a period of six days in a coastal environment, and at 150 m for a period of 20.6 days in an oligotrophic environment. Effective preservative/poison concentrations used were predetermined from laboratory tests. Parameters tested for relative effects included particulate retention of C, N and selected trace metals, and the effects of the various preservatives/poisons introduced via diffusion chambers or free in solution on in situ microbial growth. In addition, the potential contaminating role of large, nonsinking zooplankton (i.e., “swimmers”) was investigated.

Substantial differences between treatments were observed. Effects were not uniform, and appeared to be parameter-specific. For example, during the short-term deployment (six days), no significant differences in C flux were observed at 100 m, regardless of preservative used. Traps treated with azide yielded significantly lower N values. At 300 m (short-term deployment), and 150 m (long-term deployment), the azide treatments produced the lowest mean C and N values. Conversely, the formalin traps gave the highest C and N values relative to all treatments at these depths. In terms of metals, >70% of both Cd and Mn were lost to the trap solutions, regardless of oceanic area or time deployed, while most of the Fe tended to remain in the particulate phase. Zinc, largely in association with the particulate phase over the six-day deployment, was lost to the density solution during the 20.6-day deployment, while Pb results were intermediate between these extremes. Results of the diffusion chamber experiment indicate that the formalin and mercuric ion treatments were equally effective regardless of the mode of introduction (i.e., diffusion chamber or free in solution). Azide did not appear as effective when introduced via diffusion.

21 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: May 1, 1984

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Marine Research, one of the oldest journals in American marine science, publishes peer-reviewed research articles covering a broad array of topics in physical, biological and chemical oceanography. Articles that deal with processes, as well as those that report significant observations, are welcome. Biological studies involving coupling between ecological and physical processes are preferred over those that report systematics. The editors strive always to serve authors and readers in the academic oceanographic community by publishing papers vital to the marine research in the long and rich tradition of the Sears Foundation for Marine Research. We welcome you to the Journal of Marine Research.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Purchase The Sea
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more