The time(s) of the photographed | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

The relationship between the photographic and optical images and time has been the subject of great deal of debate. Despite their differences, what many of these considerations have in common is their focus on the , whether mechanical (the camera), biological (the eye–brain as the optical receiver), social or the memory and imagination of the observer. My aim here is to shift the emphasis from the to the or that is photographed or viewed and to explore how the constraints implied by our modern understanding of the Universe, concerning space and time, impact on the way we perceive photographic and optical images. Viewed from this perspective, photographs can be treated as light projections of sections of the four-dimensional observable world onto two-dimensional spatial photographic or viewing surfaces. I shall show that despite the severe reduction that such projections imply, these modern considerations have the important consequence of bestowing a upon optical images, including photographs. This realization dramatically changes the way we view photographs. I give examples of this rich temporality through considerations of terrestrial images – and more significantly images of the , where these temporal effects are far more pronounced.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00015_1
2019-10-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baetens, J.,, Streitberger, A., and van Gelder, H.. (eds) ( 2010), Time and Photography, Leuven:: Leuven University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Batchen, G.. ( 1999), Burning with Desire, Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de Duve, T.. ( 2017;), ‘ Time exposure and snapshot, the photograph as paradox. ’, in J. Elkins. (ed.), Photography Theory, London:: Routledge;, pp. 10924.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Liang, J., and Wang, L. V.. ( 2018;), ‘ Single-shot ultrafast optical imaging. ’, Optica, 5:9, pp. 111327.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mikami, H.,, Gao, L., and Goda, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Ultrafast optical imaging technology: Principles and applications of emerging methods. ’, Nanophotonics, 5:4, pp. 497509.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Potter, M. C.,, Wyble, B.,, Hagmann, C. E., and McCourt, E. S.. ( 2014;), ‘ Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. ’, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 76:2, pp. 27079.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ramalingam, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Photography and other images of time in 1830’s London. ’, in J. Baetens,, A. Streitberger, and H. van Gelder. (eds), Time and Photography, Leuven:: Leuven University Press;, pp. 326.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tavakol, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ Time(s) of photographs. ’, East End Archive, http://www.eastendarchive.org/COLLECTIONS/FoundImages.aspx. Accessed 11 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tavakol, Reza. ( 2019;), ‘ The time(s) of the photographed. ’, Philosophy of Photography, 10:2, pp. 195206, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00015_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00015_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00015_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): cosmos; encoding; light years; spacetime; Special Relativity; temporality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error