Whose life is it anyway? Practice-based research into performed fictional-autobiography and the paradox of fiction | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

This article explores the notion of ‘self’ as it pertains to autobiographical writing, and its repercussions for the fact/fiction dichotomy inherent in autobiographical praxis. The mode of articulation is a discussion of the reception of two one-man plays: (2016) and (2017). Both plays are written and performed by this writer. Drawing on philosophical, cognitive and spiritual discourses, I show that ‘selfhood’ is not a transparent and unproblematic proposition. I then re-examine the so-called paradox of fiction. I argue that it is common experience to care about notional entities and suggest that this comes about by way of ‘transfictional disavowal’ and ‘affective metalepsis’. Finally, I offer an exemplary text, read first as ‘fiction’, and then as ‘autobiography’. I then propose a new modality of the ‘paradox of fiction’, which offers a satisfactory reading position of autobiographical writings based on a re-evaluation of ‘selfhood’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp.12.1-2.61_1
2019-04-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, Woody. ( 1981), Side Effects, New York:: Ballantine Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Joseph. ( 1996), The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to Film Theory, Carbondale, IL:: Southern Illinois University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barthes, Roland. ( 1977), Image-Music-Text (trans. Stephen Heath) , New York:: Noonday;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bordwell, David. ( 1985), Narration in the Fiction Film, Madison, WI:: University of Wisconsin Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bordwell, David. ( 2005;), ‘ Principles of film narration. ’, in T. Wartenburg, and A. Curran. (eds), The Philosophy of Film, Carlton, OR, Malden, MA and Oxford:: Blackwell;, pp. 18389.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll, Noël. ( 1990), The Philosophy of Horror, or, the Paradoxes of the Heart, London, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carroll, Noël. ( 1999;), ‘ Film, emotion and genre. ’, in C. Plantinga, and G. M. Smith. (eds), Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, Baltimore and London:: John Hopkins University Press;, pp. 2147.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Currie, Greg. ( 1990), The Nature of Fiction, Cambridge, New York and Sydney:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. El Miskin, Tejani. ( 1993;), ‘ Killing joke. ’, The New Yorker, 24 May, p. 73.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Genette, Gérard. ( 1972), Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method (trans. J. Lewin) , Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris, Sam. ( 2015), Waking Up: Searching For Spirituality without Religion, London:: Black Swan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. ( 1953), Reason in History (trans. Robert S. Hartman) , New York:: Bobbs-Merrill;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. James, William. ( 1884;), ‘ What is an emotion?. ’, Mind, 9, pp. 188205.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lovat, Simon. ( 2008;), ‘ In dialogue with the reel: The forms and functions of the cinematic self-reflexive gesture. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Falmer: University of Sussex.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lovat, Simon. ( 2016), Memoires of a Confused Man, unpublished play text .
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lovat, Simon. ( 2017), Are Strings Attached?, unpublished play text .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Man, Paul De. ( 1979;), ‘ Autobiography as de/facement. ’, MLN Comparative Literature, 94:5, pp. 91930.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Myrick, Daniel, and Sanchez, Eduardo. ( 1998), The Blair Witch Project, USA:: Haxan Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Plantinga, Carl. ( 1999;), ‘ The scene of empathy and the human face on film. ’, in C. Plantinga, and G. M. Smith. (eds), Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, Baltimore and London:: John Hopkins University Press;, pp. 23955.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Radford, Colin. ( 1975;), ‘ How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina?. ’, Proceedings of the Aristotolean Society, Supplemental Volume , 49, pp. 6780.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Renov, M.. (ed.) ( 1993), Theorising Documentary, London, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rosenstone, Robert A.. ( 2005), The Man Who Swam into History: The (Mostly) True Story of My Jewish Family, Austin, TX:: University of Texas Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sangharakshita, Urgyen. ( 2001), A Survey of Buddhism: Its Doctrines and Methods Through the Ages, , 9th ed.., Birmingham:: Windhorse;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schreier, Magrit. ( 2004;), ‘ “Please help me; all I want to know is: Is it real or not?”: How recipients view the reality status of The Blair Witch Project. ’, Poetics Today, 25:2, pp. 30534.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Seife, Ethan De. ( 2007;), ‘ The history of mock documentary. ’, http://www.spinaltapfan.com/articles/seife/seifi9.html. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  26. Sinnerbrink, Richard. ( 2011), New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images, London, New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith, Murray. ( 1995), Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion and the Cinema, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Walton, Kendall L.. ( 1990), Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. White, Hayden. ( 1987), The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, Baltimore, London:: The John Hopkins University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams, Raymond. ( 1980;), ‘ The veto of the imagination: A theory of autobiography. ’, in J. Olney. (ed.), Autobiography: Essays Theatrical and Critical, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;, pp. 26895.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lovat, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Whose life is it anyway? Practice-based research into performed fictional-autobiography and the paradox of fiction. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 12:1&2, pp. 6175, doi: 10.1386/jwcp.12.1-2.61_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp.12.1-2.61_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error