Applauders and authors: Notes on the profits and losses of audience engagement | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. JAWS: Journal of Arts Writing by Students
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2055-2823
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2831

Abstract

Social practices, whether described as socially-engaged, participatory or community-based, share the potential to transform audience members into active participants in an artwork or project. However, the purpose of this public engagement is sometimes in conflict with the private experience of the viewer, constructing a complex relationship between audience, artist and gallery. Beginning by contextualizing the historic position of the audience in relation to the arts, the present article uses this as grounding to unpick elements of the dynamic which exist today. ‘The audience’ investigates the reported social benefits of engaging in the arts, questioning how evidence of these positive effects is reported and judged. This article exemplifies Marcelo Sánchez-Camus’ work with patients in palliative care and Spacemakers’ community-based projects as artworks intended to instigate positive social change. Further, ‘The artist’ explores the relationship between those facilitating these projects and their audience. By breaking down the term ‘audience’ into viewers, participants, collaborators and co-authors, one can use levels of agency to segment those involved and the differing experiences of their involvement. Petra Bauer’s long-term collaborative work with SCOT PEP is used to demonstrate how a group’s agency and stakes within an artwork can be enhanced by building relationships on equal terms. Finally, ‘The gallery’, uses the high-profile examples of Tate Group and Venice Biennale to demonstrate how the more powerful entities in the art world can misrepresent engagement and participation as quantitative markers of success or accessibility. This article ultimately aims to question what motivates the production of social practice and how these entities are important in constituting a successful process and outcome, for audience, artist and institute.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jaws_00012_1
2020-06-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, Kate. ( 2013;), ‘ Cricklewood Town Square by spacemakers. ’, Dezeen , 10 September, https://www.dezeen.com/2013/09/10/cricklewood-mobile-town-square-by-spacemakers/#:~:targetText=For%20Spacemakers%20it’s%20the%20incidental,these%20squares%2C%20attracting%20passers%20by. Accessed 29 September 2019.
  2. Arts Council England ( 2014), The Value of Arts and Culture to People and Society, Manchester:: Arts Council England;, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Value_arts_culture_evidence_review.pdf. Accessed 2 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arts Council England ( 2019;), ‘ Is my project ready?. ’, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/national-lottery-project-grants/my-project-ready. Accessed 2 December 2019.
  4. Bauer, Petra,, Smith, Molly,, Stacey, Fraces. and ‘Gem’ ( 2019;), ‘ Workers! A conversation. ’, Parse, 9, Spring, https://parsejournal.com/article/workers/. Accessed April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Beech, David. ( 2008;), ‘ Include me out! – Dave Beech on participation in art. ’, Art Monthly, 315, April, Artmonthly.co.uk , https://www.artmonthly.co.uk/magazine/site/article/include-me-out-by-dave-beech-april-2008. Accessed 18 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishop, Clare. ( 2006;), ‘ The social turn: Collaboration and it’s discontents. ’, Artforum International, 44:6, pp. 178–83, https://www.gc.cuny.edu/CUNY_GC/media/CUNY-Graduate-Center/PDF/Art%20History/Claire%20Bishop/Social-Turn.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop, Clare. ( 2012), Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, , 1st ed.., London:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Conner, Lynn. ( 2007;), ‘ In and out of the dark: A theory about audience behaviour from Sophocles to spoken word. ’, in S. Tepper, and B. Ivey. (eds), Engaging Art: The Next Great Transformation of America’s Cultural Life, London:: Routledge;, pp. 103–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Fontaine, Clare. ( 2019;), ‘ The visitor as a commercial partner: Notes on the 58th Venice Biennale. ’, e-flux, 102, September, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/102/283348/the-visitor-as-a-commercial-partner-notes-on-the-58th-venice-biennale/. Accessed 3 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Four Thought ( 2019;), ‘ Facing Death Creatively. ’, BCC Radio 4, UK , 17 July, https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0006tkv. Accessed 13 November 2019.
  11. Frasz, Alexis, and Sidford, Holly. ( 2017;), ‘ Mapping the landscape of socially engaged artistic practice. ’, Art Making Change, September, http://artmakingchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Mapping_the_Landscape_of_Socially_Engaged_Artistic_Practice_Sept2017.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gopnik, Blake. ( 2014;), ‘ Great art needs an audience. ’, The Art Newspaper, 23:254, http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=a3e107b4-e2ba-4327-a44a-53e5ff785556%40sessionmgr4006. Accessed 29 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hine, Dougald. ( 2019;), ‘ Writings, talks, projects. ’, Dougald Hine, http://dougald.nu/about/. Accessed 2 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kapprow, Alan. ( 1993), Essays on the Blurring of Art and Life, Berkeley:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lippard, Lucy. ( 2010;), ‘ Further afield. ’, in C. Wright, and A. Schneider. (eds), Between Art and Anthropology: Contemporary Ethnographic Practice, London:: Berg;, pp. 23–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Matarasso, François. ( 2007;), ‘ Common ground: Cultural action as a route to community development. ’, Community Development Journal, 42:4, pp. 449–58, https://academic.oup.com/cdj/article/42/4/449/359263. Accessed 1 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Markusen, Ann, and Brown, Alan. ( 2014;), ‘ From audience to participants: New thinking for the performing arts. ’, Análise Social, 49:213, pp. 866–83, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43234394. Accessed 23 October 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Tate Gallery ( 2019), The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery Annual Accounts 2018-2019, CCS0419988580 , London:: Tate Gallery;, https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us/tate-reports. Accessed 2 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. West Norwood Feast ( 2019;), ‘ History of feast. ’, https://westnorwoodfeast.com/history/. Accessed 29 November 2019.
  20. Wong, Samson Kei Shun. ( 2019;), ‘ Applying an ethological perspective of art to the community arts and socially engaged arts. ’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 18:3, pp. 205–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Purchase, Sophie. ( 2020;), ‘ Applauders and authors: Notes on the profits and losses of audience engagement. ’, Journal of Arts Writing by Students, 6:1, pp. 27–37, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jaws_00012_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jaws_00012_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): audience; co-authorship; engagement; experience; participant agency; participation; social practice

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error