To be ‘skilled’ or not to be ‘skilled’? A case study exploring the interaction of two crafts in anthropological fieldwork in Madagascar | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 1757-1936
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1944

Abstract

This article reflects on the use of, and interactions between, embroidery and reed weaving as methods in anthropological fieldwork with Malagasy craftswomen. The research explores changes in craft methodologies as weavers faced with declining natural resources have shifted to practising embroidery instead. Engagement with the making process was central to the research design, through an apprenticeship in reed weaving and participant observation using both crafts. Reflection on this approach suggests that the researcher’s pre-existing skills affected the role that each craft took in the research, shaping distinct modes of interaction and generating different types of knowledge. Research activities using weaving, in which the researcher was seen as ‘unskilled’, tended to generate technical, practical and logistical knowledge. Activities using embroidery, in which the researcher was already experienced and seen as a ‘skilled’ practitioner, shaped more exploratory research spaces in which more personal conversations emerged. This article discusses ways that the two processes were used to complement each other and suggests that combining both ‘skilled’ and ‘unskilled’ positions could help to overcome some of the challenges of cross-cultural craft research.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Economic and Social Research Council (Award 159402168)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jaac_00005_1
2020-03-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, S. E.. ( 2018;), ‘ The embeddedness of craft making and its implications for participatory design: A north-south case study. ’, Making Futures, 5, https://www.plymouthart.ac.uk/documents/Sarah_Emily_Brown.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gatt, C., and Ingold, T.. ( 2013;), ‘ From description to correspondence: Anthropology in real time. ’, in W. Gunn,, T. Otto, and R. Smith. (eds), Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 13958.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gauntlett, D., and Holzwarth, P.. ( 2006;), ‘ Creative and visual methods for exploring identities. ’, Visual Studies, 21:1, pp. 8291.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ingold, T.. ( 2010a;), ‘ Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials. ’, working paper, Manchester:: University of Manchester;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ingold, T.. ( 2010b;), ‘ The textility of making. ’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, pp. 91102.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ingold, T.. ( 2013), Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Marchand, T. H. J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Muscles, morals and mind: Craft apprenticeship and the formation of person. ’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 56:3, pp. 24571.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Marchand, T. H. J.. ( 2009), The Masons of Djenné, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Marchand, T. H. J.. ( 2011;), ‘ The pursuit of pleasurable work: An anthropology of craft and craftspeople. ’, lecture delivered at SOAS University of London, London, 11 May , https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/events/inaugurals/11may2011-the-pursuit-of-pleasurable-work-an-anthropology-of-craft-and-craftspeople.html. Accessed 22 October 2017.
  10. Morse, J.. ( 1995;), ‘ The significance of saturation. ’, Qualitative Health Research, 5:2, pp. 14749.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray, K.. ( 2010;), ‘ Outsourcing the hand: An analysis of craft-design collaborations across the global divide. ’, Craft and Design Enquiry, 24:1, pp. 5973.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. O’Connor, E.. ( 2017;), ‘ Touching tacit knowledge: Handwork as ethnographic method in a glassblowing studio. ’, Qualitative Research, 17:2, pp. 21730.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pink, S.. ( 2007), Doing Visual Ethnography, , 2nd ed.., London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Portisch, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ The craft of skilful learning: Kazakh women’s everyday craft practices in western Mongolia. ’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16, pp. S6279.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Reitan, J. B.. ( 2014;), ‘ Learning by watching Vernacular Iñupiaq-Inuit design learning as inspiration for design education. ’, Techne Serien-Forskning i slöjdpedagogik och slöjdvetenskap, 21:2, https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/1263. Accessed 5 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schön, D.. ( 1991), The Reflective Practitioner, London:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shercliff, E., and Twigger Holroyd, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Making with others: Working with textile craft groups as a means of research. ’, Studies in Material Thinking, 14:7, https://www.materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/0176_SMT_V14_P07_FA.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tunstall, E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Decolonizing design innovation: Design anthropology, critical anthropology, and indigenous knowledge. ’, in W. Gunn,, T. Otto, and R. C. Smith. (eds), Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;, pp. 23250.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Venkatesan, S.. ( 2010;), ‘ Learning to weave; weaving to learn… what?. ’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16:S1, pp. S15875.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brown, Sarah Emily. ( 2020;), ‘ To be “skilled” or not to be “skilled”? A case study exploring the interaction of two crafts in anthropological fieldwork in Madagascar. ’, Journal of Arts & Communities, 10:1&2, pp. 5366, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac_00005_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jaac_00005_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jaac_00005_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): anthropology; craft; embroidery; Madagascar; making; weaving
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error