Rethinking communication research methodologies: Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Communication Conference (IPCC) | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-2681
  • E-ISSN: 1757-269X
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00001_2
2020-04-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/iscc/11/1/iscc.11.1.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00001_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Afşar, S. T.. ( 2015;), ‘ Akademisyenlerin çalışma yaşam kalitesini Hacettepe Üniversitesi üzerinden okumak. ’, Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 13:50, pp. 13473.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aydın Turan, Ş.,, Dil, E., and Pınar, M. E.. ( 2019;), ‘ Performans odaklı bir üniversitede akademisyenlerin çalışma deneyimleri. ’, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17:33, pp. 5984.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergman, I.. ( 1966), Persona, Sweden:: AB Svensk Filmindustri;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, P.. ( 1984;), ‘ The sense of distinction. ’, in Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;, pp. 26063.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Çevik, H.. ( 2019;), ‘ “Araştırmaktan korkmak”: Cumhuriyet tarihi boyunca akademik çalışma konularının sınırları. ’, in P. U. Semerci, and E. Erdoğan. (eds), Siyasetteki Gölge Korku, Istanbul:: İthaki Yayınları;, pp. 12554.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cress, P. E.. ( 2017;), ‘ Are predatory conferences the dark side of the open access movement?. ’, Aesthetic Surgery Journal / The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 37:6, pp. 73438.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crick, N. A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Pragmatism. ’, in Communication: Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-31. Accessed 24 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cross, G. A.,, David, C. S.,, Graham, M. B., and Thralls, C.. ( 1996;), ‘ Thinking and rethinking research methodology. ’, Business Communication Quarterly, 59:3, pp. 10516.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Demir, S. B.. ( 2018;), ‘ Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?. ’, Journal of Informetrics, 12:4, pp. 1296311.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dewey, J.. ( 1938), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York:: H. Holt and Company;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eadie, W.. ( 2009;), ‘ Communication as a field and as a discipline. ’, in W. Eadie. (ed.), 21st Century Communication: A Reference Handbook, , 2nd ed.., Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE Publications;, pp. 1221.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M.. ( 1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York:: Pantheon Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Herbst, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Disciplines, intersections, and the future of communication research. ’, Journal of Communication, 58:4, pp. 60314.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrick, J.. ( 2016), The History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction, , 5th ed.., Oxon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. IPCC ( 2019;), ‘ Reflections on IPCC2018 re-thinking methodology. ’, Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Communication Conference (IPCC) 2018, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, 28–29 May, https://ipcc.bilgi.edu.tr/post–conference. Accessed 30 October 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kane, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Communication studies, disciplination and the ontological stakes of interdisciplinarity: A critical review. ’, Communication & Society, 29:3, pp. 87102.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koçak, Z.. ( 2019;), ‘ Predatory publishing and Turkey. ’, Balkan Medical Journal, 36:4, pp. 199201.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. National Thesis Center ( 2013;), ‘ Homepage. ’, National Thesis Center, 3 May, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.jsp. Accessed 30 October 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Olson, S.. ( 1989;), ‘ Mass media: A bricolage of paradigms. ’, in S. King. (ed.), Human Communication as a Field of Study: Selected Contemporary Views, Albany, NY:: State University of New York Press;, pp. 5784.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Olson, S.. ( 1994;), ‘ Renewed alchemy: Science and humanism in communication epistemology. ’, in F. Casmir. (ed.), Building Communication Theories: A Socio/Cultural Approach, Mahwah, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers;, pp. 4986.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pooley, J. D.. ( 2016;), ‘ Communication theory and the disciplines. ’, in K. B. Jensen,, R. T. Craig,, J. D. Pooley, and E. W. Rothenbuhler. (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, NJ:: John Wiley & Sons;, pp. 116.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sterne, J.. ( 2012), MP3 The Meaning of a Format, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Swanson, D.. ( 1993;), ‘ Fragmentation, the field, and the future. ’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, pp. 16372.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Walker, M. B.. ( 2016), Slow Philosophy: Reading against the Institution, London:: Bloomsbury Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wolton, D.. ( 1997), Penser la Communication, Paris:: Flammarion;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Yılmaz, Z.. ( 2018), Yeni Türkiye’nin ruhu, Istanbul:: İletişim Yayınları;.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00001_2
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error