Uncovering Russian communication style preferences: Monological sequencing versus dialogical engagement | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1952
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1960

Abstract

When we communicate with others, we usually know when we are expected to contribute to an evolving dialogue, such as during a debate, or when it is suitable to generate predictable responses, for example, at a marriage ceremony. However, in cross-cultural communication situations, communicating partners may have different assumptions in this respect. In particular, when a western communicator expects a dialogical development, a Russian participant may expect the same communication situation to progress as a sequence of predictable communication acts. This clash of implicit expectations often results in communication failure, without either party realizing that implementing incompatible approaches to information sharing is the reason for this failure. In this article, I introduce the terms ‘dialogical engagement’ and ‘monological sequencing’ whilst exploring cross-cultural communication problems between Russia and the West. I use these terms to describe mechanisms that characterize both cultures’ preferred communication patterns and which, when inadvertently deployed, cause collisions between Russian and western communicating partners. By uncovering these differences, I intend to progress beyond merely acknowledging cross-cultural communication problems between the two worlds. Besides, as in the Russian cultural setting, more communication situations are implicitly expected to develop as monological sequences than similar situations in the West, understanding this particular distinction may prevent practitioners in numerous fields from making the mistake of expecting cross-cultural communication situations to develop in line with their implicit assumptions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00011_1
2020-09-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berry, John. ( 1990), A Captive in the Land, USSR and USA:: Ask Soviet-American Films and Kinostudiya imeni M. Gorkogo;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biryukov, Nikolai, and Sergeyev, Victor. ( 1993;), ‘ Parliamentarianism and sobornost’: Two models of representative institutions in Russian political culture. ’, Discourse & Society, 4:1, pp. 5774.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. ( 1970), Two Worlds of Childhood: US and USSR, New York:: Russell Sage Foundation;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Churchill, Winston. ( 1939), The Russian Enigma, BBC Home Service;, 1 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. ( [1912] 2009), The Brothers Karamazov (trans. C. Garnett.), New York:: Dover Giant Thrift Editions, Macmillan and Dover Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elliot, Julian. ( 2009;), ‘ Motivation and behaviour in Russian schools. ’, in M. Fleer,, M. Hedegaard, and J. Tudge. (eds), The World Yearbook of Education 2009: Childhood Studies and the Impact of Globalization, New York and Oxon:: Routledge;, pp. 23353.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fell, Elena. ( 2017;), ‘ Macro-reasoning and cognitive gaps: Understanding post-Soviet Russians’ communication styles. ’, ESSACHESS – Journal for Communication Studies, 10:1(19), pp. 91110, http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/367. Accessed 1 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fell, Elena, and Lukianova, Natalia. ( 2015;), ‘ British universities: International students’ alleged lack of critical thinking. ’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215:8, pp. 28, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815059200. Accessed 1 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fleer, Marilyn,, Hedegaard, Mariane, and Tudge, Jonathan. (eds) ( 2009), The World Yearbook of Education 2009: Childhood Studies and the Impact of Globalization, New York and Oxon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedgut, Theodore. ( 1979), Political Participation in the USSR, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gel’man, Vladimir. (ed.) ( 2018), Authoritarian Modernization in Russia: Ideas, Institutions, and Policies, Studies in Contemporary Russia , London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Giles, Keir. ( 2018), Moscow Rules: What Drives Russia to Confront the West, London:: Brookings Institution;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gogol, Nikolai. ( 1996), Dead Souls (trans. R. Pevear, and L. Volokhonsky.), New York:: Pantheon Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gromyko, Aleksey. ( 2016;), ‘ How to understand Russia?. ’, Extract from speech at X Assembly of the Russian World, Moscow, 3 November, Russkiy Mir Foundation , 15 December, https://russkiymir.ru/en/publications/218685/. Accessed 26 November 2019.
  15. Maroshi, Valerij. ( 2015;), ‘ Troika as a symbol of Russia’s historical path in Russian literature of the twentieth century. ’, Philology and Culture, 2:40, pp. 20409, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/troyka-kak-simvol-istoricheskogo-puti-rossii-v-russkoy-literature-hh-veka/viewer. Accessed 1 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Marques Guedes, Armando. ( 2020), personal communication (telephone conversation) with Elena Fell , 25 February.
  17. Tyutchev, Fyodor. ( 2000), The Complete Poems of Tyutchev in an English Translation by F. Jude, http://www.oocities.org/zombielabs/Tyutchev.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fell, Elena. ( 2020;), ‘ Uncovering Russian communication style preferences: Monological sequencing versus dialogical engagement. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 11:1, pp. 4359, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00011_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00011_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00011_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error