Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

A Russellian Response to the Structural Argument Against Physicalism

Buy Article:

$22.78 + tax (Refund Policy)

According to David Chalmers (2002), 'we have good reason to suppose that consciousness has a fundamental place in nature' (p. 135). This, he thinks is because the world as revealed to us by fundamental physics is entirely structural -- it is a world not of things, but of relations -- yet relations can only account for more relations, and consciousness is not merely a relation (pp. 120-21). Call this the 'structural argument against physicalism.' I shall argue that there is a view about the relationship between mind and body, what I call, 'Russellian physicalism' that is consistent with the premises of the structural argument yet does not imply that consciousness is fundamental.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Philosophy Program, The Graduate Center, CUNY, 365 Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA., Email: [email protected]

Publication date: January 1, 2010

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more