Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure


Buy Article:

$21.84 + tax (Refund Policy)

John Stuart Mill identifies a cross-current in Plato's thinking that both blinds and perfects humanity. He concludes that the dialogues are bifurcated between the goals of reason and art: portraits of the philosopher's often heroic search for absolute truth and artistic images that cover up or hide reason's limited understanding of morality and truth itself. Mill regrets that Plato, fearing social disintegration, ultimately subordinates the dialectical, liberating current to the ethical, artistic, current. Mill is also concerned with preventing social decay and recognizes that he himself confronts a contradiction between reason and art in creating a cultural and religious outlook that defines the best form of human existence as creative deeds that serve > the public good. Determined not to subordinate reason to art, Mill utilizes Plato's portrayal of the heroic and teaching of the natural religion of the Statesman to help resolve this contradiction.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Christianity; Hegel; Mill; Plato; Socrates; art; culture; imagination; natural law; natural religion; nature; reason; romanticism; theism

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 2017

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more