Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure


Buy Article:

$22.64 + tax (Refund Policy)

Perhaps the least controversial area of F.H. Bradley's writings relates to his views on punishment. Commentators universally recognize Bradley's theory of punishment as a retributivist theory of punishment. This article challenges the received wisdom. I argue that Bradley does not endorse retributivism as commonly understood. Instead, he defends the view that punishment is non-retributivist and serves the end of societal maintenance. Moreover, Bradley defends this view consistently from Ethical Studies to later work on punishment. Instead of holding a theory of punishment largely unique amongst British Idealists of his time, Bradley's views on punishment are far more consistent than previously thought.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Bosanquet; Bradley; God; Hegel; Oakeshott; der Staat; societas

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Politics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU.

Publication date: January 1, 2011

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more