Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure


Buy Article:

$22.55 + tax (Refund Policy)

It is easy to read Hobbes's moral thinking as a deviant contribution to 'modern' natural law, especially if Leviathan (1651) is read through a lens provided by De Cive (1642). But The Elements of Law (1640) encourages the view that Hobbes's argument is 'physicalist', that is, that it requires no premises beyond those required by his physics of matter in motion. The Elements included a draft De Homine and its argument is intimately connected with De Cive's; it shows how such concepts as 'reason', 'right', 'natural law' and 'obligation' can be understood in physicalist terms. But Hobbes's decision to print the latter work in isolation has led to serious misunderstandings
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: De Cive; De Homine; Elements of Law; God; Grotius; Hobbes; Leviathan; Pufendorf; Tuck; moral; natural law; obligation; optics; reason; right; sense; sovereignty; supposition; virtue

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: School of Politics and IR, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AA, Email: [email protected]

Publication date: January 1, 2011

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more