Sul Metodo Storiografico di Acusilao di Argo
An analysis of the surviving fragments of Akusilaos (Acusilaus) shows that the Argive historian worked out a critical method to check the early poetic and oral Greek traditions as an instrument for his historical work. Fragment 28 in particular suggests that the historian, by choosing a Tirynthian myth instead of the Argive tradition, i.e. the civic tradition of another polis, regarded the critical examination of his sources as more valuable than local patriotism and that he wrote his genealogical work before the Battle of Sepeia (494 BC), when the Spartan victory caused an unbridgeable and long-lasting rift between Argos and Tiryns. Akusilaos is thus reinstated as the earliest historian for whom we have substantial fragments.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: October 1, 2012
More about this publication?
- Historia, first published in 1952 by Karl Friedrich Stroheker and Gerold Walser is an international, peer-reviewed journal on Greek and Roman antiquity. Articles are in English, German, French and Italian. It features original articles on Greek history, the Roman Republic and Empire as well as late antiquity. It covers all aspects of political, economic, religious and social life and deals with legal, archaeological, numismatic and epigraphical questions.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites