This study compared the field performance of sugarcane plants originating from three different sources: control, non-cryopreserved embryogenic calluses, cryopreserved embryogenic calluses and macropropagated material of the same commercial hybrid. Several agronomic traits were evaluated on 100 plants per treatment over a 27-month period covering the growth of the stool and of the first ratoon. Significant differences between treatments were observed only during the first six months of field growth of sugarcane stools. Stems produced from in vitro cultured material, irrespective of their cryopreservation status, had a smaller diameter and a shorter height than those produced from macropropagated material. These differences disappeared by12 months of stool field growth.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: January 1, 2002
More about this publication?
CryoLetters is a bimonthly international journal for low temperature sciences, including cryobiology, cryopreservation or vitrification of cells and tissues, chemical and physical aspects of freezing and drying, and studies involving ecology of cold environments, and cold adaptation
The journal publishes original research reports, authoritative reviews, technical developments and commissioned book reviews of studies of the effects produced by low temperatures on a wide variety of scientific and technical processes, or those involving low temperature techniques in the investigation of physical, chemical, biological and ecological problems.