The Forest Rights Act 2007: implications for forest dwellers and protected areas
The plight of tribals and other traditional forest dwellers is pitiable, as they continue to live without any rights over forest land or resources. Clearly this is undesirable. However, the newly enacted Forest Rights Act will help neither the traditional forest dwellers nor to conserve the forests, and might actually end up making both worse-off. Laws and policies related to nature and natural resources need to pass three tests in order to be considered progressive and effective. They need to promote equity, be scientific, and be implementable. The new Forest Rights Act fails all three tests. It also fails to include many other options available for addressing the injustices done to traditional forest dwellers while ensuring that conservation needs, and the rights of animals, are not trampled upon.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Consultant, NRM, Delhi, C-17A, DDA Flats, Munirka, New Delhi-110067, India.
Publication date: June 1, 2008
More about this publication?
- The International Forestry Review is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of forest policy and science, with an emphasis on issues of transnational significance. It is published four times per year, in March, June, September and December. Theme editions are a regular feature and attract a wide audience.
The IFR is part of The Global Forest Information Service - GFIS
International Forestry Review has an Impact Factor of 1.705
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Online guide to scientific writing
- Back issues and missing issues
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites