Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Validating Diagnostic Tests, Correct and Incorrect Methods, New Developments

Buy Article:

$68.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Background: Clinical developments of new treatments are impossible without adequate diagnostic tests. Several working parties including the Consolidated Standard Randomized Trials (CONSORT) movement and the Standard for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) group have launched quality criteria for diagnostic tests. Particularly, accuracy-, reproducibility- and precision-assessments have been recommended, but methods of assessment have not been defined so far.

Objective: To summarize correct and incorrect methods and new developments for that purpose.

Results and conclusions: A diagnostic test can be either qualitative like the presence of an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate to demonstrate pneumonia, or quantitative like ultrasound flow velocity to estimate invasive electromagnetic flow velocity.

Qualitative diagnostic tests can be assessed for

-accuracy using sensitivity / specificity / overall accuracy, and receiver operated (ROC) curves,

-reproducibility using Cohen's kappas,

-precision using confidence intervals of sensitivity / specificity / overall accuracy. Quantitative diagnostics tests can be assessed for

-accuracy using a linear regression line (y = a + b x) and testing a = 0.00 / b = 1.00,

-reproducibility using duplicate standard errors, repeatability coefficients or intraclass correlations,

-precision by calculating confidence intervals. Improved confidence intervals can be obtained by data modeling.

A significant linear correlation between the diagnostic test and the gold standard test does not correctly indicate adequate accuracy. A small mean difference between repeated measures or a significant linear relationship between repeated measures does not indicate adequate reproducibility.

New developments include continuous ROC curves, intraclass correlations, and Bland-Altman agreement tests for the accuracy assessments of quantitative diagnostic tests.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Validation; accuracy; duplicate standard deviation; intraclass correlation; precision; qualitative and quantitative diagnostic tests; repeatability coefficients; reproducibility; sensitivity; specificity

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: May 1, 2008

More about this publication?
  • Current Clinical Pharmacology publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in clinical pharmacology. The journal's aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: pharmacokinetics; therapeutic trials; adverse drug reactions; drug interactions; drug metabolism; pharmacoepidemiology; and drug development. The journal is essential reading for all researchers in clinical pharmacology.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more