Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Genoegen nemen met minder

Buy Article:

$15.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract

Settling for less: a deliberate political choice or a lack of information?

In a well-functioning democracy voters should elect parties and representatives with whom they agree on policy issues. The current paper investigates the extent to which Dutch voters in the 2017 parliamentary election had accurate information about parties’ policy positions. We elicit the extent to which voters think they vote for parties with whom they maximally agree (subjective congruence) and the extent to which this is actually true (objective congruence). Results show voters in our sample to have accurate information about approximately half of the policy positions of a random large party. Only 21.5 percent voted for a party with whom they were maximally objectively congruent. Objective congruence does not increase with information accuracy. Voters appear to consciously accept losses in terms of subjective congruence, as only 34.7 percent votes for a party with whom they think to be maximally congruent. These results are compatible with the interpretation of voters first choosing a party, and then (to some degree) adapting their personal policy positions to those of the chosen party.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: congruence; information; policy preferences; representation; voting behavior

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: September 1, 2019

More about this publication?
  • Mens & Maatschappij, opgericht in 1925, publiceert artikelen representatief voor het hele onderzoeksgebied van de sociale wetenschappen, ongeacht richting of stroming, en altijd met een scherp oog voor kwaliteit en maatschappelijke relevantie. Een grondige en opbouwende reviewprocedure is onderdeel van het publicatieproces.

    Behalve reguliere nummers verschijnt ieder jaar een themanummer waarin specialisten op uitnodiging van de redactie schrijven over een actueel thema.

    In de etalage
    In deze terugkerende rubriek worden opvallende internationale publicaties, van Nederlandse wetenschappers en passend binnen de scope, in de kijker gezet. De redactie zet zich ervoor in dat waardevolle bijdragen, eerder gepubliceerd in buitenlandse wetenschappelijke tijdschriften, ook in het Nederlands beschikbaar zijn en laagdrempelig worden uitgelicht.

    Scriptieprijs
    Elk jaar reikt de redactie de Mens & Maatschappij Scriptieprijzen uit aan een artikel gebaseerd op een bachelor- en masterscriptie van hoge kwaliteit en met opvallende relevantie voor de sociale wetenschappen. In 2020 won het onderzoek door Lotte van Beers over hoe persoonlijk contact en mediacontact weerslag hebben op houdingen ten opzichte van verschillende migrantengroepen de prijs voor de masterscriptie.

    Mens & Maatschappij, founded in 1925, publishes articles representative of the entire social sciences research field, regardless of school of thought, and always with a keen eye for quality and social relevance. A thorough and constructive review procedure is part of the publication process.

    In addition to regular issues, the editors invite specialists to contribute to the annual special issue focussing on a current theme.

    In de etalage
    In this recurring section, striking international publications by Dutch scientists and within the journal's scope are put in the spotlight. The editorial team is committed to ensure that valuable contributions, previously published in foreign scientific journals, are also available in Dutch.

    Scriptieprijs
    Each year, the editors award the Mens & Maatschappij Scriptieprijs to an article based on a BA and MA thesis of high quality and with striking relevance to the social sciences. In 2020, Lotte van Beers' research on how personal and media contact affect attitudes towards different migrant groups was rewarded the prize for her MA thesis.

  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Back Issues, 1925-2000
  • Back Issues, 2001-2008
  • Peer Review, Ethics and Malpractice
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more