Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Open Access Op rozen zitten, of op zwart zaad

Download Article:
 Download
(HTML 104.9 kb)
 
or
 Download
(PDF 426.7 kb)
 
Summary

A cushy life, or being dead broke: Two decades of income inequality

Did income inequality decrease since the 1990s due to less pronounced differentials in educational attainment among the Dutch population, as modernisation theory presumes? Have the growing labour participation of women and the ensuing demise of the one-earner family translated into greater income disparities? And has public support for income redistribution dwindled? Various measures calculated over the tax data from the Income Panel Survey show that income inequality did not become less in the Netherlands, but grew somewhat, especially since 2001. This is most clearly the case with regard to earned income, and less so for gross income. During the new millennium the weakest growth occurred in the inequality of disposable income, and here the overall picture since 1990 is fairly stable. A decomposition analysis indicates that changes in educational attainment and in the average incomes of the lower, middle and higher educated hardly affected income inequality over time. The same applies to the rise in the number of people of non-western origin and the altering income levels of ethnic groups. Changes in the number of earners per household, however, did alter income inequality. The rising share of comparatively poor single persons saw their average income deteriorate in the 2000s, while the affluent group of double earners grew in size and generally experienced further income improvement. Over time, couples depending on one income became a rather small category, and their average amount of income decreased. Yet changes in people’s income sources were more important. This especially concerns the inequality enhancing effect of the growth in the relative number of pensioners and self-employed in the 2000s, vis-à-vis the dwindling share of employees. However, this was mitigated by higher average pensions among the elderly and lower incomes of entrepreneurs. In public opinion 1991 proved to be a turning point: The trend towards ever lower support for the redistribution of income that prevailed in the 1970s and 1980s reversed.
No References for this article.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: decomposition; income inequality; poverty; public opinion; wealth

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Cok Vrooman is hoofd van de sector Arbeid en Publieke Voorzieningen van het Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, en bijzonder hoogleraar Sociale Zekerheid en Participatie aan de Universiteit Utrecht, afdeling Sociologie. Zijn onderzoek richt zich op arbeidsmarkt- en sociale zekerheidsvraagstukken, armoede, ongelijkheid, sociale uitsluiting en comparatieve institutionele analyses. Postadres: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Postbus 16164, 2500 BD Den Haag., Email: [email protected] 2: Jean Marie Wildeboer Schut is wetenschappelijk medewerker bij de sector Arbeid en Publieke Voorzieningen van het Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. Hij is gespecialiseerd in inkomensvraagstukken. Postadres: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Postbus 16164, 2500 BD Den Haag., Email: [email protected]

Publication date: December 1, 2015

More about this publication?
  • Mens & Maatschappij, opgericht in 1925, stelt zich ten doel sociaalwetenschappelijke kennis te verspreiden die relevant is voor de Nederlandse samenleving. Hiertoe publiceert M&M oorspronkelijke, Nederlandstalige artikelen van auteurs uit alle sociale wetenschappen, ongeacht richting of stroming. M&M kenmerkt zich door: een breed palet aan thema's, representatief voor het hele onderzoeksgebied van de sociale wetenschappen; artikelen waarin de confrontatie wordt gezocht tussen sociaalwetenschappelijke theorie en empirisch onderzoek; een grondige en opbouwende reviewprocedure met oog voor wetenschappelijke kwaliteit en beleidsrelevantie. Behalve reguliere nummers publiceert M&M ieder jaar een themanummer waarin specialisten op uitnodiging van de redactie schrijven over een actueel thema.

    Mens & Maatschappij, founded in 1925, publishes the latest research in the social sciences relevant to Dutch society. To this end M&M publishes original articles in the Dutch language of authors from all social sciences, irrespective of approach. M&M can be characterized by: its broad range of topics, representative for the whole research domain of the social sciences; articles that confront theory with empirical research; a thorough and constructive review process with an eye for scholarly quality and relevance for policy. M&M publishes four issues a year, including a once-yearly special issue in which specialists write extensively about a topical theme, on the invitation of the editorial board.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Back Issues, 1925-2000
  • Back Issues, 2001-2008
  • Peer Review, Ethics and Malpractice
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more