Policy and Politics to Drive Change in End-of-Life Care: Assessing the Best and Worst Places to Die in America
The United States spends $3.4 trillion annually on healthcare, but outcomes are suboptimal, and almost a third of the care is inappropriate or unnecessary. A small percentage of patients accounts for a disproportionate amount of spending. Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare data show serious gaps in the quality of advanced illness and end-of-life care delivery, allowing us to rank best and worst places to die. Such statistics are important for legislative and regulatory changes aiming to address disparities and ensure person-centered care delivery. Implementing initiatives requires a community of stakeholders committed to improving care in advanced illness, as well as culture change.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: March 1, 2017
More about this publication?
- Practitioners and researchers in the field of aging have long relied on Generations to provide them with in-depth research, practical applications, and valuable insight into the lives of older adults and those who work with them. Each issue features several articles on a single topic, guest-edited by one or more recognized experts in the subject area, and includes contributions from a range of practitioners, researchers, policymakers and elders. Authoritative and comprehensive, Generations offers a wide range of perspectives on relevant and timely topics in aging. This is what makes Generations an ideal resource for professionals, academics and anyone interested in aging.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites