Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Growth and Nutritional Biomarkers of Preterm Infants Fed a New Powdered Human Milk Fortifier: A Randomized Trial

Buy Article:

$52.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess growth and nutritional biomarkers of preterm infants fed human milk (HM) supplemented with a new powdered HM fortifier (nHMF) or a control HM fortifier (cHMF). The nHMF provides similar energy content, 16% more protein (partially hydrolyzed whey), and higher micronutrient levels than the cHMF, along with medium-chain triglycerides and docosahexaenoic acid.Methods:

In this controlled, multicenter, double-blind study, a sample of preterm infants ≤32 weeks or ≤1500 g were randomized to receive nHMF (n = 77) or cHMF (n = 76) for a minimum of 21 days. Weight gain was evaluated for noninferiority (margin = –1 g/day) and superiority (margin = 0 g/day). Nutritional status and gut inflammation were assessed by blood, urine, and fecal biochemistries. Adverse events were monitored.
Results:

Adjusted mean weight gain (analysis of covariance) was 2.3 g/day greater in nHMF versus cHMF; the lower limit of the 95% CI (0.4 g/day) exceeded both noninferiority (P < 0.001) and superiority margins (P = 0.01). Weight gain rate (unadjusted) was 18.3 (nHMF) and 16.8 g · kg−1 · day−1 (cHMF) between study days 1 and 21 (D1–D21). Length and head circumference (HC) gains between D1 and D21 were not different. Adjusted weight-for-age z score at D21 and HC-for-age z score at week 40 corrected age were greater in nHMF versus cHMF (P = 0.013, P = 0.003 respectively). nHMF had higher serum blood urea nitrogen, pre-albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and calcium (all within normal ranges; all P ≤ 0.019) at D21 versus cHMF. Both HMFs were well tolerated with similar incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events.
Conclusions:

nHMF providing more protein and fat compared to a control fortifier is safe, well-tolerated, and improves the weight gain of preterm infants.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: growth; human milk; low birth weight

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Neonatology, University of Liège, CHR Citadelle, Liège, Belgium 2: Maternité Régionale Universitaire A. Pinard, Nancy 3: CIC Pédiatrique 1401 INSERM-CHU, Bordeaux 4: Service de Neonatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France 5: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Clinical Science and Community Health, Fondazione IRCCS “Ca’ Granda” Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy 6: Hôpital Couple Enfant, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble 7: Hôpital Clocheville, CHU de Tours, Tours, France 8: Klinikum Westbrandenburg GmbH, Potsdam, Germany 9: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland 10: Hôpital Clemenceau, CHU de Caen, Caen, France 11: Nestlé Clinical Development Unit, Lausanne, Switzerland 12: Nestlé Nutrition R&D, Vevey, Switzerland 13: Nestlé Nutrition R&D, King of Prussia, PA 14: Children's Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Publication date: October 1, 2017

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more