Skip to main content

Open Access Use of Traditional and Complementary Medicine as Self-Care Strategies in Community Health Centers

Abstract

In China, Community Health Centers (CHCs) are major providers of primary care services, but their potential in empowering patients’ self-management capacity has not been assessed. This study aims to describe self-care practice patterns amongst CHC attendees in urban China.

In this cross-sectional quantitative study, 3360 CHC patients from 6 cities within the Pearl Delta Region were sampled using multistage cluster sampling.

Thirty-seven per cent had used with over-the-counter Chinese herbal medicines (OTC CHMs) in the past year and majority of respondents found OTC CHMs effective. OTC CHMs were more popular amongst those who needed to pay out of pocket for CHC services. Less than 10% used vitamins and minerals, and those with a lower socioeconomic background have a higher propensity to consume. Although doubts on their usefulness are expressed, their use by the vulnerable population may reflect barriers to access to conventional health care, cultural affinity, or a defense against negative consequences of illnesses. About 25% performed physical exercise, but the prevalence is lower amongst women and older people. Taiji seems to be an alternative for these populations with promising effectiveness, but overall only 6% of CHC attendees participated.

These results suggest that CHCs should start initiatives in fostering appropriate use of OTC CHM, vitamins, and minerals. Engaging community pharmacists in guiding safe and effective use of OTC CHM amongst the uninsured is essential given their low accessibility to CHC services. Prescription of Taiji instead of physical exercises to women and older people could be more culturally appropriate, and the possibility of including this as part of the CHC services worth further exploration.

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: From the JC School of Public Health and Primary Care (VCHC, SYSW, MCSW, XW, SL, RSTH, ELMY, SMG); Hong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine (VCHC, SYSW), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; School of Public Health (HHXW), Sun Yat-Sen University; School of Public Health (JW), Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; and Institute of Global Health Innovation (SMG), Imperial College London, London, UK. 2: From the JC School of Public Health and Primary Care (VCHC, SYSW, MCSW, XW, SL, RSTH, ELMY, SMG); Hong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine (VCHC, SYSW), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; School of Public Health (HHXW), Sun Yat-Sen University; School of Public Health (JW), Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; and Institute of Global Health Innovation (SMG), Imperial College London, London, UK. 3: From the JC School of Public Health and Primary Care (VCHC, SYSW, MCSW, XW, SL, RSTH, ELMY, SMG); Hong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine (VCHC, SYSW), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; School of Public Health (HHXW), Sun Yat-Sen University; School of Public Health (JW), Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; and Institute of Global Health Innovation (SMG), Imperial College London, London, UK.

Publication date: 01 June 2016

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content