Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:32:55.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A zoo animal's neighbourhood: how conspecific neighbours impact welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

JC Whitham  and
LJ Miller
JC Whitham*
Affiliation:
Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield Zoo, 3300 Golf Road, Brookfield, IL 60513, USA
LJ Miller
Affiliation:
Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield Zoo, 3300 Golf Road, Brookfield, IL 60513, USA
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: jessica.whitham@czs.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the zoological community strives to provide the best possible living environment for non-human animals, space limitations constrain where zoos can house particular species. Therefore, an individual may live in proximity to animals that impact its behaviour, physiology, reproductive function or overall welfare status. This article examines how solitary and social species living in managed settings are positively and negatively affected by conspecific neighbours. When making housing decisions, zoos should follow husbandry recommendations outlined by zoo associations, integrate natural history information and attempt to view the environment from the perspective of the species of interest. Furthermore, researchers can collect survey, behavioural and physiological data to examine how variables, such as density, distance between neighbours, the age/sex of conspecifics and types/amount of exposure to others influence welfare. Ultimately, zoos should consider the needs of individuals and investigate whether welfare can be enhanced by modifying enclosures, husbandry routines, enrichment schedules or access to conspecifics. A zoo's willingness to alter an animal's exposure to conspecifics may have a substantial impact on physical, mental and emotional health.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourconspecific neighboursphysiologywelfare monitoringzoo animals
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 127 - 136
Copyright
© 2019 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, MC and Lawrence, AB 1987 Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Science 45: 103–110Google Scholar
Appleby, MC, Lawrence, AB and Illius, AW 1989 Influence of neighbours on stereotypic behaviour of tethered sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90041-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums) 2018 Animal Care Manuals. https://www.aza.org/animal-care-manualsGoogle Scholar
AZA Gruiformes, TAG 2009 Kori Bustard ( Ardeotis kori) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums: Silver Spring, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
Baker, KC and Aureli, F 1996 The neighbor effect: other groups influence intragroup behavior in captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 40: 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1996)40:3<283::AID-AJP5>3.0.CO;2-UGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, JCE 2009 Programmatic approaches to assessing and improving animal welfare in zoos and aquariums. Zoo Biology 28:519–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20260Google ScholarPubMed
Bashaw, MJ, Kelling, AS, Bloomsmith, MA and Maple, TL 2007 Environmental effects on the behavior of zoo-housed lions and tigers, with a case study of the effects of a visual barrier on pacing. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10: 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701313116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, C, Torgerson-White, L, Fripp, D, Watters, J and Petric, A 2015 A multi-institutional assessment of factors influen-cing locomotion and pacing in captive okapis (Okapia johnstoni). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 18(1): S43–S61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2015.1075835Google Scholar
Boissy, A, Manteuffel, G, Jensen, MB, Moe, RO, Spruijt, B, Keeling, LJ, Winckler, C, Forkman, B, Dimitrov, I, Langbein, J, Bakken, M, Veissier, I and Aubert, A 2007 Assessment of positi-ve emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology & Behavior 92: 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, L 1986 Behavior problems of equids in zoos. In: Crowell-Davis, SL and Houpt, KA (eds) The Veterinary Clinics of North America, Equine Practice Volume 2(3) pp 653–664. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30713-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, JL 1978 Avian communal breeding systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 123–155. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, JL, Paris, S, Prado-Oviedo, NA, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Morfeld, KA and Carlstead, K 2016 Reproductive health assessment of female elephants in North American zoos and asso-ciation of husbandry practices with reproductive dysfunction in African elephants (Loxodonta africana). PLoS One 11(7): e0145673. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, A, Mench, JA and Wielebnowski, N 2011 Practical strategies to assess (and improve) welfare. In: Appleby, MC, Mench, JA, Olsson, IAS and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare, Second Edition pp 200–214. CABI Publishing: Cambridge, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936594.0200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, JL and Seidensticker, J 1993 Behavioral and adrenocortical responses to environmental changes in leo-pard cats (Felis bengalensis). Zoo Biology 12: 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430120403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Fraser, J, Bennett, C and Kleiman, DG 1999a Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in US zoos: II Behavior, bree-ding success, and mortality in relation to housing facilities. Zoo Biology 18: 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)18:1<35::AID-ZOO5>3.0.CO;2-L3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Mellen, J and Kleiman, DG 1999b Black rhinoce-ros (Diceros bicornis) in US zoos: I Individual behavior profiles and their relationship to breeding success. Zoo Biology 18: 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1999)18:1<17::AID-ZOO4>3.0.CO;2-K3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clubb, R and Mason, G 2001 Does behavioural ecology influen-ce the development of stereotypic behaviour in captivity? In: Ostler, J and Worman, G (eds) The Marwell Scientific Report 1999/2000, Issue 1 pp 9–11. Pebble Graphics: Romsey, UKGoogle Scholar
Coe, JC 2004 Mixed species rotation exhibits. Presented at the ARAZ-PA (The Australasian Regional Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria) Annual Conference. 7-11 March 2004, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Cooper, JJ, McDonald, L and Mills, DS 2000 The effect of increasing visual horizons on stereotypic weaving: implications for the social housing of stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00115-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, JJ and Nicol, CJ 1994 Neighbour effects on the deve-lopment of locomotor stereotypies in bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Animal Behaviour 47: 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1025Google Scholar
Daoudi, S, Badihi, G and Buchanan-Smith, HM 2017 Is mixed-species living cognitively enriching? Enclosure use and wel-fare in two captive groups of tufted capuchins (Sapajus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Animal Behavior and Cognition 4:51–69. https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.06.02.2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBoer, SP, Garner, JP, McCain, RR, Lay, DC Jr, Eicher, SD and Marchant-Forde, JN 2015 An initial investigation into the effects of isolation and enrichment on the welfare of laboratory pigs housed in the PigTurn® system, assessed using tear staining, behaviour, physiology and haematology. Animal Welfare 24: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.1.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rouck, M, Kitchener, AC, Law, G and Nelissen, M 2005 A comparative study of the influence of social housing conditions on the behaviour of captive tigers (Panthera tigris). Animal Welfare 14: 229–238Google Scholar
Garner, JP, Meehan, CL, Famula, TR and Mench, JA 2006 Genetic, environmental, and neighbor effects on the severity of stereotypies and feather picking in orange-winged Amazon par-rots (Amazona amazonica): an epidemiological study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.009Google Scholar
Hediger, H 1965 Environmental factors influencing the repro-duction of zoo animals. In: Beach, FA (ed) Sex and Behavior pp 319–354. Wiley: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Herskin, MS and Jensen, KH 2000 Effects of different degrees of social isolation on the behaviour of weaned piglets kept for experimental purposes. Animal Welfare 9: 237–249Google Scholar
Kleiman, DG 1994 Mammalian sociobiology and zoo breeding pro-grams. Zoo Biology13: 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430130505Google Scholar
Kuhar, CW, Bettinger, TL, Sironen, AL, Shaw, JH and Lasley, BL 2003 Factors affecting reproduction in zoo-housed geoffroy's tamarins (Saguinus geoffroyi). Zoo Biology 22: 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindburg, DG and Fitch-Snyder, H 1994 Use of behavior to evaluate reproductive problems in captive mammals. Zoo Biology 13: 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430130506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G, Clubb, R, Latham, N and Vickery, S 2007 Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle stereo-typic behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ, Cooper, J and Clarebrough, C 2001 Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature 410: 35–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAfee, LM, Mills, DS and Cooper, JJ 2002 The use of mirrors for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00086-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, PD, Cripps, PJ, French, NP, Green, LE and Nicol, CJ 1995 Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the Thoroughbred horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03041.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellen, J, Hayes, MP and Shepherdson, DJ 1998 Captive envi-ronments for small felids. In: Shepherdson, DJ, Mellen, JD and Hutchins, M (eds) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals pp 184–201. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Hunt, S and Gusset, M 2015 Caring for Wildlife: The World Zoo and Aquarium Animal Welfare Strategy. WAZA Executive Office: Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Miller, LJ, Bettinger, T and Mellen, J 2008 The reduction of stereotypic pacing in tigers (Panthera tigris) by obstructing the view of neighbouring individuals. Animal Welfare 17: 255–258Google Scholar
Miller, LJ, Pisacane, CB and Vicino, GA 2016 Relationship bet-ween behavioural diversity and faecal glucocorticoid metabolites: a case study with cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). Animal Welfare 25:325–329. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.3.325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, DS and Davenport, K 2002 Evidence for the importance of visual stimuli in the control of equine weaving behaviour. Journal of Animal Science 74: 95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, KN and Tromborg, CT 2007 Sources of stress in cap-tivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, K, Schrott, A and Kabai, P 2008 Possible influence of neighbours on stereotypic behaviour in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111: 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2007.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninomiya, S, Sato, S and Sugawara, K 2007 Weaving in sta-bled horses and its relationship to other behavioural traits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106: 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.06.014Google Scholar
Olsson, IAS and Westlund, K 2007 More than numbers matter: the effect of social factors on behaviour and welfare of laborato-ry rodents and non-human primates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 103: 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2006.05.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgeldinger, M 1997 Protective and territorial behavior in captive siamangs (Hylobates syndactylus). Zoo Biology 16: 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1997)16:4<309::AID-ZOO3>3.0.CO;2-E3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palya, WL and Zacny, JP 1980 Stereotyped adjunctive pecking by caged pigeons. Learning & Behavior 8: 293–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199609Google Scholar
Powell, DM 2010 A framework for introduction and socialization processes for mammals. In: Kleiman, DG, Thompson, KV and Baer, CK (eds) Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques, Second Edition pp 49–61. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
Schultz, EF and Tapp, JT 1973 Olfactory control of behavior in rodents. Psychological Bulletin 79: 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033817CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwandt, ML, Howell, S and Fritz, J 2000 Applied primatolo-gy in the captive environment: science-based colony management of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology 51(1): 27 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Siegford, JM 2013 Multidisciplinary approaches and assessment techniques to better understand and enhance zoo nonhuman ani-mal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 16: 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2013.827914Google Scholar
Slotnick, B, Schellinck, H and Brown, R 2005 Olfaction. In: Whishaw, IQ and Kolb, B (eds) The Behavior of the Laboratory Rat pp 90–104. Oxford University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Troxell-Smith, SM and Miller, LJ 2016 Using natural history information for zoo animal management: a case study with okapi (Okapia johnstoni). Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research 4: 38–41Google Scholar
Videan, EN, Fritz, J, Schwandt, M and Howell, S 2005 Neighbor effect: evidence of affiliative and agonistic social conta-gion in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology 66: 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieuille-Thomas, C and Signoret, JP 1992 Pheromonal trans-mission of an aversive experience in domestic pig. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 1551–1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993228Google Scholar
Wasser, SK and Barash, DP 1983 Reproductive suppression among female mammals: implications for biomedicine and sexual selection theory. The Quarterly Review of Biology 58: 513–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/413545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, DL 2004 A review of environmental enrichment for ken-nelled dogs, Canis familiaris. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85:307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, JC and Miller, LJ 2016 Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare. Animal Welfare 25: 395–409. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.4.395Google Scholar
Whitham, JC and Wielebnowski, N 2013 New directions for zoo animal welfare science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004Google Scholar
Wielebnowski, NC, Fletchall, N, Carlstead, K, Busso, JM and Brown, JL 2002 Noninvasive assessment of adrenal activity associated with husbandry and behavioral factors in the North American clouded leopard population. Zoo Biology 21: 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, RB 1971 Attraction, affiliation, and attachment. In: Eisenberg, JF and Dillon, WS (eds) Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior pp 143–179. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar