Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T14:39:15.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pinch-induced behavioural inhibition (clipthesia) as a restraint method for cats during veterinary examinations: preliminary results on cat susceptibility and welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

V Nuti ,
C Cantile ,
A Gazzano ,
C Sighieri  and
C Mariti
V Nuti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
C Cantile
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
A Gazzano
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
C Sighieri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
C Mariti*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: cmariti@vet.unipi.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cats are often subjected to minimally painful or forced procedures during routine clinical practice, which can be poorly tolerated, leading veterinary surgeons to need to offer physical restraint, usually aided by an assistant. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and ultimate welfare implications of using clipthesia as a method of restraint during veterinary examination. This was carried out in a real clinical setting and compared to manual scruffing. Twenty-seven cats were restrained, during a veterinary examination, using two stationery clips placed on the skin along the cervical dorsal midline, whilst a group of 13 cats were restrained through gentle manual scruffing. Susceptibility to clipthesia (ie a positive clip score) was observed in 81.5% of cats, while a complete response was found in 40.7% of subjects. The presence or absence of a disease/condition did not affect the susceptibility. Heart rate and the number of cats showing mydriasis (pupillary dilation) was statistically higher during manual scruffing, whilst plasma cortisol did not differ between the two groups. The more responsive the cats were to clipthesia, the more they displayed kneading and purring. These preliminary findings suggest that clipthesia is not more stressful than manual scruffing in restraining cats during a veterinary examination. However, not all cats were found to be susceptible to this method of restraint. Further research is needed to clarify whether clipthesia should be implementated as a matter of course in veterinary practice from the point of view of welfare and safety.

Keywords

animal welfarecatclipnosisclipthesiascruffingveterinary examination
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 115 - 123
Copyright
© 2016 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albanese, A, Altavista, MC and Rossi, P 1986 Organization of central nervous system dopaminergic pathways. Journal of Neural Transmission 22: 3–17Google ScholarPubMed
Amir, S, Brown, ZW, Amir, Z and Ornstein, K 1981 Body pinch induces long lasting cataleptic like immobility in mice, behav-ior characterization and the effect of naloxone. Life Science 28:1189–1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(81)90697-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, BV 2003 Feline Behavior. A Guide for Veterinarians, Second Edition. Saunders: St Louis, MO, USAGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J and Cameron-Beaumont, C 2000 The signalling repertoire of the domestic cat and its undomesticated relatives. In: DC Turner and P Bateson (ed) The Domestic Cat, Second Edition pp 67–93. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, JWS, Casey, RA and Brown, SL 2012 The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat, Second Edition. CABI: Wallingford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845939922.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, RA and Bradshaw, JWS 2007 The assessment of wel-fare. In: Rochlitz, I (ed) The Welfare of Cats pp 23–46. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3227-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell-Davis, S and Murray, T 2006 Veterinary Psychopharmacology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Ezure, K and Wilson, VJ 1984 Interaction of tonic neck and vestibular reflex in the forelimbs of the decerebrate cats. Experimental Brain Research 54: 289–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00236229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feline Advisory Bureaux 2010 Cat Friendly Practice. https://www.aaha.org/public_documents/professional/guidelines/f elinelifestageguidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fleischmann, A and Urca, G 1988 Clip-induced analgesia and immobility in the mouse: pharmacological characterization. Neuropharmacology 27: 641–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(88)90187-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galup, JR and Gordon, G 1974 Notes that animal hypnosis, or tonic immobility, is an easily induced and readily quantifiable phe-nomenon found in many different species. Psychological Bulletin 81(11): 836–853Google Scholar
Genaro, G, Moraes, W, Silva, JCR, Adania, CH and Franci, CR 2007 Plasma hormones in neotropical and domestic cats undergoing routine manipulations. Research in Veterinary Science 82: 263–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.07.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilman, S and Newman, SW 2003 Manter and Gratz's Essential of Clinical Neuroanatomy and Neurophysiology, Tenth Edition. FA Davis Company: Philadelphia, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
Hart, BL 1978 Handling and restraint of the cat. Feline Practice 5: 10–11Google Scholar
Iki, T, Ahrens, F, Pasche, KH, Bartels, A and Erhard, MH 2011 Relationships between scores of the feline temperament profile and behavioural and adrenocortical responses to a mild stressor in cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 132: 71–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemm, WR 1971 Neurophysiologic studies of immobility reflex (‘animal hypnosis’). Neurosciences Research 4: 165–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-512504-8.50011-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klemm, WR 2001 Behavioral arrest: in search of the neural con-trol system. Progress in Neurobiology 65: 453–471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(01)00016-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leedy, MG, Fishelson, BA and Cooper, LL 1983 A simple method of restraint for use with cats. Feline Practice 13: 32–33Google Scholar
Mariti, C, Gazzano, A, Moore, Jl, Baragli, P, Chelli, L and Sighieri, C 2012 Perception of dogs’ stress by their owners. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Application and Research 7(4): 213–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, A, Day, S, McAdie, T, Meredith, A, Barley, J, Hickman, J and Laews, L 2006 Trancing rabbits: relaxed hypno-sis or a state of fear? In: De Meester, R, Moons, C and Mulkens, F (eds) Proceedings of VDWE International Congress on Companion Animal Behaviour and Welfare pp 135–137. 23-24 September 2006, Ghent, Belgium. Vlaamse Dierenartsenvereniging vzw: Sint-Niklaas, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
McComb, K, Taylor, AM, Wilson, C and Charlott, BD 2009 The cry embedded within the purr. Current Biology 19(13): R507–R508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCune, S 2010 The domestic cat. In: Hubrecht, R and Kirkwood, JK (eds) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research animals, Eighth Edition pp 455–472. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444318777.ch31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, K 2013 Manual of Clinical Behavioral Medicine for Dogs and Cats. Elsevier: St Louis, MO, USAGoogle Scholar
Pozza, ME, Stella, JL, Chappuis-Gagnon, A, Wagner, SO and Buffington, T 2008 Pinch-induced behavioral inhibition (‘clipnosis’) in domestic cats. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 10: 82–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2007.10.008Google ScholarPubMed
Power, AE and McGaugh, JL 2002 Cholinergic activation of the basolateral amygdala regulates unlearned freezing behavior in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 134: 307–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00046-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiner, PB 1986 Correlational analysis of central noradrenergic neuronal activity and sympathetic tone in behaving cats. Brain Research 378(1): 86–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(86)90288-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochlitz, I 2009 Basic requirements for good behavioural health and welfare in cats. In: Horwitz, D and Mills, DS (eds) BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Behavioural Medicine pp 35–48. British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Gloucester, UKGoogle Scholar
Rodan, I, Sundhal, E, Carney, H, Gagnon, A-C, Heath, S, Landsberg, G, Seksel, K and Yin, S 2011 Feline-friendly han-dling guidelines. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 13: 364–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2011.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarttelin, MF 1993 Restraint induced by non-noxious skin clips: modifications of this technique results in a greater success rate in the adult cat. International Journal of Neuroscience 71: 131Google Scholar
Tsuji, S, Ichioka, S, Sekiya, N and Nakatsuka, T 2005 Analysis of ischemia reperfusion injury in a microcirculatory model of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 13: 209–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130213.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valente, L, De Keuster, T and Da Graça Pereira, G 2013 Clipnosis®as a handling method in cats: physiological and behav-ioural welfare indicators. In: Mills, DS, Da Graça Pereira, G and Jacinto, DM (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth International Veterinary Behaviour Meeting pp 159–160. 26-28 September 2013, Lisbon, Portugal. PsiAnimal: Portinha, PortugalGoogle Scholar
Von Muggenthaler, E and Wright, B 2003 Solving the cat's purr mystery using accelerometers. Acoustics Australia 31(2): 61Google Scholar