Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:15:46.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: management factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

EM Baxter*
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Science Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
KMD Rutherford
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Science Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
RB D’Eath
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Science Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
G Arnott
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Science Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
SP Turner
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Science Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
P SandØe
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Sciences and Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 8, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark
VA Moustsen
Affiliation:
Danish Agriculture and Food Council, Pig Research Centre, Axelborg, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 KbhV, Denmark
F Thorup
Affiliation:
Danish Agriculture and Food Council, Pig Research Centre, Axelborg, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 KbhV, Denmark
SA Edwards
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
AB Lawrence
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Science Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Emma.Baxter@sruc.ac.uk

Abstract

Increasing litter size has long been a goal of pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) breeders and producers in many countries. Whilst this has economic and environmental benefits for the pig industry, there are also implications for pig welfare. Certain management interventions are used when litter size routinely exceeds the ability of individual sows to successfully rear all the piglets (ie viable piglets outnumber functional teats). Such interventions include: tooth reduction; split suckling; cross-fostering; use of nurse sow systems and early weaning, including split weaning; and use of artificial rearing systems. These practices raise welfare questions for both the piglets and sow and are described and discussed in this review. In addition, possible management approaches which might mitigate health and welfare issues associated with large litters are identified. These include early intervention to provide increased care for vulnerable neonates and improvements to farrowing accommodation to mitigate negative effects, particularly for nurse sows. An important concept is that management at all stages of the reproductive cycle, not simply in the farrowing accommodation, can impact on piglet outcomes. For example, poor stockhandling at earlier stages of the reproductive cycle can create fearful animals with increased likelihood of showing poor maternal behaviour. Benefits of good sow and litter management, including positive human-animal relationships, are discussed. Such practices apply to all production situations, not just those involving large litters. However, given that interventions for large litters involve increased handling of piglets and increased interaction with sows, there are likely to be even greater benefits for management of hyper-prolific herds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2013 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, IL, Berg, S and BØe, KE 2005 Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa): purely accidental or a poor mother? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 229243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, IL, Haukvik, IA and BØe, KE 2009 Drying and warming immediately after birth may reduce piglet mortality in loose-housed sows. Animal 3: 592597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108003650CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, IL, Tajet, GM, Haukvik, IA, Kongsrud, S and BØe, KE 2007 Relationship between postnatal piglet mortality, environmental factors and management around farrowing in herds with loose-housed, lactating sows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science 57: 3845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064700601159626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, MC, Weary, DM, Taylor, AA and Illmann, G 1999 Vocal communication in pigs: who are nursing piglets screaming at? Ethology 105: 881892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00459.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arey, DS and Sancha, ES 1996 Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 50: 135145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)01075-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, G and Elwood, RW 2009 Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Animal Behaviour 77: 9911004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandrick, M, Pieters, M, Pijoan, C, Molitor, TW and Baidoo, SK 2011 Effect of cross-fostering on transfer of maternal immunity to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to piglets. Veterinary Record 168: 100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.c6163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartol, FF, Wiley, AA and Bagnell, CA 2008 Epigenetic programming of porcine endometrial function and the lactocrine hypothesis. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43: 273279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01174.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bate, LA, Hurnik, D and Crossley, JG 1991 Benefits of using a photo-electric alert system for farrowing operations. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: 909911. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-107Google Scholar
Baxter, EM, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2011 Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sows and piglets. Animal 5: 580600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110002272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, EM, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2012 Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs. Animal 6: 96117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazer, FW, Ford, JJ and Kensinger, RS 2001 Reproductive physiology. In: Pond, WG and Mersmann, HJ (eds) Biology of the Domestic Pig, Second Edition pp 150224. Cornell University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Bjornvad, CR, Thymann, T, Deutz, NE, Burrin, DG, Jensen, SK, Jensen, BB, MØlbak, L, Boye, M, Larsson, LI, Schmidt, M, Michaelsen, KF and Sangild, PT 2008 Enteral feeding induces diet-dependent mucosal dysfunction, bacterial proliferation, and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm pigs on parenteral nutrition. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 295: G1092G1103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00414.2007Google ScholarPubMed
BØe, K 1991 The process of weaning in pigs: when the sow decides. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 4759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90084-BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
BØe, K 1993 The effect of age at weaning and post-weaning environment on the behavior of pigs. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science 43: 173180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064709309410162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BPEX 2011a Technical work instruction: Split suckling. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB): Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, UKGoogle Scholar
BPEX 2011b Effect of rescue decks on pre-weaning mortality in a prolific sow herd. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB): Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, UKGoogle Scholar
Brown, JME, Edwards, SA, Smith, WJ, Thompson, E and Duncan, J 1996 Welfare and production implications of teeth clipping and iron injection of piglets in outdoor systems in Scotland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 27: 95105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(96)01013-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckner, C 1986 Epidemiological observation on piglet rearing in Bavaria, with reference to the consequences of tooth clipping. PhD Thesis, Tierarztliche Fakultat Ladwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Burger, A 1983 Consequences of clipping incisors in piglets. PhD Thesis, Tierarztliche Fakultat Ladwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Cassar, G, Amezcua, R and Friendship, RM 2010 Periparturient analgesia: does it improve neonatal survival and growth? Proceedings of the 21st International Pig Veterinary Society Congress p 251. 18-21 July 2010, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Cassar, G, Kirkwood, RN, Friendship, R and Zvonimir, P 2005 Sow and litter performance following farrowing induction with prostaglandin: effect of adjunct treatments with dexamethasone or oxytocin. Journal of Swine Health Production 13(2): 8185Google Scholar
Cecchinato, A, Bonfatti, V, Gallo, L and Carnier, P 2008 Survival analysis of preweaning piglet survival in a dry-cured ham-producing crossbred line. Journal of Animal Science 86: 24862495. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, JC, Frankshun, A-L, Wiley, AA, Miller, DJ, Welch, KA, Ho, T-Y, Bartol, FF and Bagnell, CA 2011 Milk-borne lactocrine-acting factors affect gene expression patterns in the developing neonatal porcine uterus. Reproduction 141: 675683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christison, GI, Wenger, II and Follensbee, ME 1997 Teat seeking success of newborn piglets after drying or warming. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77: 317319. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/A96-119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, WH and Mullan, BP 1996 Nutrition and feeding of breeding stock. In: Taverner, MR and Dunkin, AC (eds) Pig Production pp 169202. Elsevier: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Coleman, GJ, Hemsworth, PH, Hay, M and Cox, M 2000 Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00073-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colson, V, Orgeur, P, Foury, A and Mormede, P 2006 Consequences of weaning piglets at 21 and 28 days on growth, behaviour and hormonal responses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98: 7088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2005.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, GM, Barnett, JL, Hodge, FM, Smith, JA and McCallum, TH 1991 The welfare of pigs in two farrowing/lactation environments: cortisol responses of sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 117127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80036-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, FR, Rizzi, R and Moles, A 2006 Aggression and anxiety in pregnant mice are modulated by offspring characteristics. Animal Behaviour 72: 773780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dantzer, R and Mormede, P 1981 Influence of weaning time on piglet behavior and pituitary-adrenal activity. Reproduction Nutrition Development 21: 661670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19810505Google Scholar
D’Eath, RB 2005 Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are mixed post-weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 199211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, MGH and Bilkei, G 2004 Cross fostering of low-birth weight piglets. Livestock Production Science 90: 279284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.02.012Google Scholar
De Passillé, AMB and Robert, S 1989 Behaviour of lactating sows: influence of stage of lactation and husbandry practices at weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 315329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90100-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Passillé, AMB, Rushen, J and Hartsock, TG 1988 Ontogeny of teat fidelity in pigs and its relation to competition at suckling. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68: 325338. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas88-037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devillers, N, Farmer, C, Le Dividich, J and Prunier, A 2007 Variability of colostrum yield and colostrum intake in pigs. Animal 1: 10331041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173110700016XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, N, Guo, Y, Knorr, C, Ma, J, Mao, H, Lan, L, Xiao, S, Ai, H, Haley, CS, Brenig, B and Huang, L 2009 Genome-wide QTL mapping for three traits related to teat number in a White Duroc x Erhualian pig resource population. BMC Genetics 10: 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, TS and Dritz, SS 2000 Effect of split nursing on variation in pig growth from birth to weaning. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217: 7981. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2000.217.79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, A, Fraser, D and Weary, DM 2008 Parent-offspring resource allocation in domestic pigs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62: 309319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0418-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybkjaer, L 1992 The identification of behavioral indicators of stress in early weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 135147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(92)90004-UGoogle Scholar
Edwards, CA and Parrett, AM 2002 Intestinal flora during the first months of life: new perspectives. British Journal of Nutrition 88: S11S18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002625CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, SA 2002 Perinatal mortality in the pig: environmental or physiological solutions? Livestock Production Science 78: 312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00180-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, SA, Brade, MA, Shepherd, CM, Simmins, PH and Riley, JE 1985 Effects of fractionated weaning on sow productivity and piglet performance. Animal Production 40: 540Google Scholar
Edwards-Jones, G 2006 Modeling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges. Animal Science 82: 783790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ASC2006112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsley, FWH 1971 Nutrition and lactation in sows. In: Faulkner, IR (ed) Lactation pp 393411. Butterworths: London, UKGoogle Scholar
English, PR, Grant, SA, McPherson, O and Edwards, SA 1999 Evaluation of the effects of positive befriending of sows and gilts (pleasant treatment) prior to parturition and in early lactation on sow behaviour, the process of parturition and piglet survival. In: Russel, AJF, Morgan, CA, Savory, CJ, Appleby, MC and Lawrence, TLJ (eds) Farm Animal Welfare: Who Writes the Rules? pp 132136. British Society of Animal Science, Occasional Publication No 23: Edinburgh, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, PR, Smith, WJ and MacLean, A 1977 The Sow: Improving her Efficiency. Farming Press Limited: Ipswich, UKGoogle Scholar
Eissen, JJ, Apeldoorn, EJ, Kanis, E, Verstegen, MWA and de Greef, KH 2003 The importance of a high feed intake during lactation of primiparous sows nursing large litters. Journal of Animal Science 8: 594603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Council Directive 2008 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Pigs. EC: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Farmer, C, Knight, C and Flint, D 2007 Mammary gland involution and endocrine status in sows: effects of weaning age and lactation heat stress. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87: 3543. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/A06-083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAWC 2011 Opinion on mutilations and environmental enrichment in piglets and growing pigs. FAWC: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1975 The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs II. Fighting during suckling and the effects of clipping the eye teeth. Journal of Agricultural Science 84: 393399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002185960005259XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1978 Observations on the behavioural development of suckling and early-weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth. Animal Behaviour 26: 2230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90004-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Phillips, PA 1989 Lethargy and low water intake by sows during early lactation: a cause of low piglet weight gains and survival. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 1322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90121-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Thompson, BK 1986 Variation in piglet weights: relationship to suckling behavior, parity number and farrowing crate design. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66(1): 3146. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Thompson, BK 1991 Armed sibling rivalry among suckling piglets. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29: 915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00164289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D, Weary, DM, Pajor, EA and Milligan, BN 1997 A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187205Google Scholar
Friendship, RM, Wilson, MR and McMillan, I 1986 Management and housing factors associated with piglet preweaning mortality. Canadian Veterinary Journal 27: 307311Google ScholarPubMed
Furniss, SR, English, PR, MacPherson, O and Birnie, M 1988 A study of the influence of warming newborn piglets either immediately following birth or soon after successful suckling. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production p 119. 21-23 March 1988, Scarborough, UKGoogle Scholar
Futterkamp, VM 2011 Mutterlose Aufzucht im Rescue-Deck. SUS Online: http://www.susonline.de/versuchsberichte/1-versuchsberichte/109-1/2011/view-category.php. [Title translation: Motherless rearing in Rescue Decks]Google Scholar
Gaskin, HR and Kelly, KW 1995 Immunology and neonatal mortality. In: Varley, MA (ed) The Neonatal Pig. Development and Survival pp 3956. CABI: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Gonyou, HW, Beltranena, E, Whittington, DL and Patience, JF 1998 The behaviour of pigs weaned at 12 and 21 days of age from weaning to market. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78: 517523. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/A98-023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunvaldsen, RE, Waldner, C and Harding, JC 2007 Effects of farrowing induction on suckling piglet performance. Journal of Swine Health Production 15(2): 8491Google Scholar
Guy, JH, Cain, P, Baxter, EM, Seddon, Y and Edwards, SA 2012 Economic evaluation of high welfare indoor farrowing systems for pigs. Animal Welfare 21(S1): 1924. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13345905673520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haussmann, MF, Carroll, JA, Weesner, GD, Daniels, MJ, Matteri, RL and Lay, DC Jr 2000 Administration of ACTH to restrained, pregnant sows alters their pigs hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Journal of Animal Science 78: 23992411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haussmann, MF, Lay, DC Jr, Buchanan, HS and Hopper, JG 1999 Butorphanol tartrate acts to decrease sow activity, which could lead to reduced pig crushing. Journal of Animal Science 77: 20542059CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, M, Orgeur, P, Levy, F, Le Dividich, J, Concordet, D, Nowak, R, Schaal, B and Mormede, P 2001 Neuroendocrine consequences of early weaning in swine. Physiology and Behavior 72: 263269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00404-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, M, Rue, J, Sansac, C, Brunel, G and Prunier, A 2004 Long-term detrimental effects of tooth clipping or grinding in piglets: a histological approach. Animal Welfare 13: 2732Google Scholar
Heim, G, Mellagi, APG, Bierhals, T, de Souza, LP, de Fries, HCC, Piuco, P, Seidel, E, Bernardi, ML, Wentz, I and Bortolozzo, FP 2012 Effects of cross-fostering within 24h after birth on pre-weaning behaviour, growth performance and survival rate of biological and adopted piglets. Livestock Science 150: 121127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL, Coleman, GJ and Hansen, C 1989 A study of the relationship between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of humans and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 301314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90099-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Brand, A and Willems, P 1981 The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and its relationship to productivity. Livestock Production Science 8: 6774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(81)90031-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Coleman, GJ and Barnett, JL 1994 Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 349362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90168-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Coleman, GJ, Cronin, GM and Spicer, EM 1995 Human care and the neonatal pig. In: Varley, MA (ed) The Neonatal Pig. Development and Survival pp 313331. CABI: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Pedersen, V, Cox, M, Cronin, GM and Coleman, GJ 1999 A note on the relationship between the behavioural response of lactating sows to humans and survival of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 4352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00047-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herpin, P, Damon, M and Le Dividich, J 2002 Development of thermoregulation and neonatal survival in pigs. Livestock Production Science 78: 2545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00183-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herpin, P, Hulin, JC, Le Dividich, J and Fillaut, M 2001 Effect of oxygen inhalation at birth on the reduction of early postnatal mortality in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79: 510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herpin, P, Le Dividich, J, Hulin, JC, Fillaut, M, DeMarco, F and Bertin, R 1996 Effects of the level of asphyxia during delivery on viability at birth and early postnatal vitality of newborn pigs. Journal of Animal Science 74: 20672075CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herskin, MS, Bonde, MK, Jorgensen, E and Jensen, KH 2011 Decubital shoulder ulcers in sows: a review of classification, pain and welfare consequences. Animal 5: 757766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173111000203XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hohenshell, LM, Cunnick, JE, Ford, SP, Kattesh, HG, Zimmerman, DR, Wilson, ME, Matteri, RL, Carroll, JA and Lay, DC 2000 Few differences found between early- and late-weaned pigs raised in the same environment. Journal of Animal Science 78: 3849CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holyoake, PK, Dial, GD, Trigg, T and King, VL 1995 Reducing pig mortality through supervision during the perinatal period. Journal of Animal Science 73: 35433551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horrell, I and Bennett, J 1981 Disruption of teat preferences and retardation of growth following cross-fostering of 1-week-old pigs. Animal Production 33: 99106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100025253Google Scholar
Horrell, I and Hodgson, J 1992a The bases of sow-piglet identification 2. Cues used by piglets to identify their dam and home pen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 329343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80070-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrell, I and Hodgson, J 1992b The bases of sow-piglet identification 1. The identification by sows of their own piglets and the presence of intruders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 319327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80069-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrell, RI 1982 Immediate behavioural consequences of fostering 1-week-old piglets. Journal of Agricultural Science 99: 329336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600030100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshino, Y, Sasaki, Y and Koketsu, YA 2009 High percentage of pigs born dead in litters in high-, intermediate- and low-performing herds. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 71: 15791583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.001579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutter, S, Heinritzi, K, Reich, E and Ehret, W 1993 The effect of different methods of tooth resection in piglets. Tierärztliche Praxis 21: 417428Google Scholar
Janczak, AM, Pedersen, LJ, Rydhmer, L and Bakken, M 2003 Relation between early fear and anxiety-related behaviour and maternal ability in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82: 121135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00055-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S, D’Eath, RB, Robson, SK and Lawrence, AB 2006 The effect of confinement during lactation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and behaviour of primiparous sows. Physiology and Behavior 87: 345352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, S, Moinard, C, Robson, SK, Sumner, BEH, Douglas, AJ, Seckl, JR, Russell, JA and Lawrence, AB 2008 Effects of weaning age on the behavioural and neuroendocrine development of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110: 166181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, HE 2009 Investigation into the pathology of shoulder ulcerations in sows. Veterinary Record 165: 171174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.165.6.171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, P 1994 Fighting between unacquainted pigs: effects of age and of individual reaction pattern. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 3752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90050-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P and Recén, B 1989 When to wean. Observations from free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 4960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90006-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, AK and Marchant-Forde, JN 2009 Welfare of pigs in the farrowing environment. In: Marchant-Forde, JN (ed) The Welfare of Pigs pp 141188. Springer: The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8909-1_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, SW and Easter, RA 2001 Nutrient mobilization from body tissues as influenced by litter size in lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 79: 21792186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, RH and Pluske, JR 2003 Nutritional management of the pig in preparation for weaning. In: Pluske, JR, Le Dividich, J and Verstegen, MWA (eds) Weaning the Pig. Concepts and Consequences pp 3751. Wageningen Academic Publishers: The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Klobasa, F, Werhahn, E and Butler, JE 1987 Composition of sow milk during lactation. Journal of Animal Science 64: 14581466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knauer, M, Stalder, KJ, Karriker, L, Baas, TJ, Johnson, C, Serenius, T, Layman, L and McKean, JD 2007 A descriptive survey of lesions from cull sows harvested at two Midwestern US facilities. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 82: 198212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruse, S, Traulsen, I and Krieter, J 2011 Analysis of water, feed intake and performance of lactating sows. Livestock Science 135: 177183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriazakis, I and Edwards, SA 1986 The effects of split suckling on behaviour and performance of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(86)90045-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010a Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 311317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010b Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness 2. Understanding dairy farmers’ motivations. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 318323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecce, JG and Morgan, DO 1962 Effect of dietary regimen on cessation of intestinal absorption of large molecules (closure) in the neonatal pig and lamb. Journal of Nutrition 78: 32633268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lensink, BJ, Leruste, H, LeRoux, T and Bizeray-Filoche, D 2009 Relationship between the behaviour of sows at 6 months old and the behaviour and performance at farrowing. Animal 3: 128134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108003261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mainau, E and Manteca, X 2011 Pain and discomfort caused by parturition in cows and sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 241251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainau, E, Dalmau, A, Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL and Manteca, X 2010 A behavioural scale to measure ease of farrowing in sows. Theriogenology 74: 12791287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.05.034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manteca, X 2009 Behavioural modifications associated with calving in dairy cows and with farrowing in sows. Second Boehringer Ingelheim Expert Forum on Farm Animal Well-being pp 2729. 29 May 2009, Alcala de Henares, SpainGoogle Scholar
Marchant-Forde, JN 2002 Piglet- and stockperson-directed sow aggression after farrowing and the relationship with a pre-farrowing, human approach test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75: 115132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00170-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant-Forde, JN, Lay, DC, McMunn, KA, Cheng, HW, Pajor, EA and Marchant-Forde, RM 2009 Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately. Journal of Animal Science 87: 14791492. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1080CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martineau, GP, Smith, BB and Wagner, WC 1993 Lactation Failure in the Sow. Pork Industry Handbook, Bulletin E-1184. Cooperative Extension Service, Mississippi State University: USAGoogle Scholar
Mason, SP, Jarvis, S and Lawrence, AB 2003 Individual differences in responses of piglets to weaning at different ages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80: 117132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00209-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, JHM and Gonyou, HW 1990 Effect of age and housing conditions on the behavioural and hemolytic reactions of piglets to weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 299309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90126-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, BN, Fraser, D and Kramer, DL 2001 The effect of littermate weight on survival, weight gain, and suckling behavior of low-birth-weight piglets in cross-fostered litters. Journal of Swine Health Production 9: 161166Google Scholar
Miquet, J and Viana, G 2010 Facilitation of nursing behavior in primiparous sows during colostrum phase improves piglet condition. Proceedings of the 21st International Pig Veterinary Society Congress p 160. 18-21 July 2010, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Moinard, C, Mendl, M, Nicol, CJ and Green, LE 2003 A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 333355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0 168-1591(02)00276-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MØller, HK, Thymann, T, Fink, LN, Frokiaer, H, Kvistgaard, AS and Sangild, PT 2011 Bovine colostrums is superior to enriched formulas in stimulating intestinal function and necrotising enterocolitis resistance in pre-term pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 105: 4453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S00071145 10003168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morise, A, Sève, B, Macé, K, Magliola, C, Le Huërou-Luron, I and Louveau, I 2011 Growth, body composition and hormonal status of growing pigs exhibiting a normal or small weight at birth and exposed to a neonatal diet enriched in proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 105(10): 14711479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510005386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow-Tesch, J and McGlone, JJ 1990 Sources of maternal odors and the development of odor preferences in baby pigs. Journal of Animal Science 68: 35633571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mota-Rojas, D, Martinez-Burnes, J, Trujillo-Ortega, ME, Alonso-Spilsbury, M, Ramirez-Necoechea, R and Lopez, A 2002 Effect of oxytocin treatment in sows on umbilical cord morphology, meconium staining, and neonatal mortality of piglets. American Journal of Veterinary Research 63: 15711574. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mota-Rojas, D, Rosales, AM, Trujillo, ME, Orozco, H, Ramirez, R and Alonso-Spilsbury, M 2005 The effects of vetrabutin chlorhydrate and oxytocin on stillbirth rate and asphyxia in swine. Theriogenology 64: 18891897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.12.018Google ScholarPubMed
Mota-Rojas, D, Trujillo-Ortega, ME, Villanueva-Garcia, D, González-Lozano, M, Orozco-Gregorio, H, Ramirez-Necoechea, R, Olmos-Hernández, A and Alonso-Spilsbury, M 2006 Can uterotonics reduce fetal and newborn piglet mortality by perinatal asphyxia and improve functional vitality? Journal of Medical Sciences 6: 884893. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jms.2006.884.893Google Scholar
Müller, K 2011 30 abgesetzte Ferkel nur eine Frage der Genetik? Möglichkeiten die Aufzuchtleistung durch Ammen zu verbessern. Landwirtschaftskammer Schleswig-Holstein. http://www.znvg.de/cms images/KMueller.pdf. [Title translation: Thirty weaners: just a matter of genetics? The possibility of breeding to improve performance of nursing sows]Google Scholar
Müller, R, Thorup, F and Hansen, CF 2012 Supplementing new born piglets with 50ml sow colostrum failed to influence piglet survival. Proceedings of the 4th European Symposium of Porcine Health Management p 118. 25-27 April 2012, Bruges, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Musse, SL 2007 Effect of manual assistance and of drying off newborn piglets. MSc Thesis, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Neal, SM and Irvin, KM 1991 The effects of crossfostering pigs on survival and growth. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, RC and Swanson, JC 2008 Implications of breaking mother-young social bonds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110: 323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, RC and Wood-Gush, DGM 1985 The suckling behaviour of domestic pigs in a semi-natural environment. Behaviour 95: 1125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853985X00028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, NE, Beattie, VE, Sneddon, IA, Breuer, K, Mercer, JT, Rance, KA, Sutcliffe, MEM and Edwards, SA 2005 Influence of individual predisposition, maternal experience and lactation environment on the responses of pigs to weaning at two different ages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90: 219232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliviero, C, Heinonen, M, Pastell, M, Heikkonen, J, Valros, A, Vainio, O and Peltoniemi, O 2007 Modern technology in supervision of parturition to prevent piglet mortality. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 49(1): S12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-49-S1-S12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, LJ, Jorgensen, E, Heiskanen, T and Damm, BI 2006 Early piglet mortality in loose-housed sows related to sow and piglet behaviour and to the progress of parturition. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 215232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, LJ, Berg, P, JØrgensen, E, Bonde, MK, Herskin, MS, MØllegaard Knage-Rasmussen, K, Kongsted, AG, Lauridsen, C, Oksbjerg, N, Poulsen, HD, SØrensen, DA, Su, G, SØrensen, MT, Theil, PK, Thodberg, K and Jensen, KH 2010 PattegrisedØdelighed i dk: Muligheder for reduktion af pattegrisedØdeligheden i Danmark. DJF Rapport Husdyrbrug Nr 86. Digisource: Denmark. [Title translation: Piglet mortality in DK: opportunities for reducing piglet mortality in Denmark]Google Scholar
Pedersen, ML, Moustsen, VA, Nielsen, MBF and Kristensen, AR 2011 Improved udder access prolongs duration of milk letdown and increases piglet weight gain. Livestock Science 140: 253261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters-Scholte, C, Koster, J, van den Tweel, E, Blomgren, K, Hamers, N, Zhu, C, van Buul-Offers, S, Hagberg, H, van Bel, F, Heijnen, C and Groenendaal, F 2002a Effects of selective nitric oxide synthase inhibition on IGF-1, caspases and cytokines in a newborn piglet model of perinatal hypoxiaischaemia. Developmental Neuroscience 24: 396404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000069045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters-Scholte, C, Koster, J, Veldhuis, W, van den Tweel, E, Zhu, C, Kops, N, Blomgren, K, Bar, D, van Buul-Offers, S, Hagberg, H, Nicolay, K, van Bel, F and Groenendaal, F 2002b Neuroprotection by selective nitric oxide synthase inhibition at 24h after perinatal hypoxia-ischemia. Stroke 33: 23042310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000028343.25901.09CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluske, JR and Williams, IH 1996 Split weaning increases the growth of light piglets during lactation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47(4): 513523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9960513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, EO, Hutson, GD, Price, MI and Borgwardt, R 1994 Fostering in swine as affected by age of offspring. Journal of Animal Science 72: 16971701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prunier, A and Quesnel, H 2000 Nutritional influences on the hormonal control of reproduction in female pigs. Livestock Production Science 63: 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00113-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunier, A, Heinonen, M and Quesnel, H 2010 High physiological demands in intensively raised pigs: impact on health and welfare. Animal 4: 886898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173 111000008XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prunier, A, Mounier, AM and Hay, M 2005 Effects of castration, tooth resection, or tail docking on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83: 216222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryce, CR and Feldon, J 2003 Long-term neurobehavioural impact of the postnatal environment in rats: manipulations, effects and mediating mechanisms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 27: 5771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00009-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H 2009 Lactational and nutritional effects on follicular development in the sow. In: Rodriguez-Martinez, H, Vallet, JL and Ziecik, AJ (eds) Control of Pig Reproduction VIII pp 121134. Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Quesnel, H 2011 Colostrum production by sows: variability of colostrum yield and immunoglobulin G concentrations. Animal 5: 15461553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173111100070XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H and Prunier, A 1995 Endocrine bases of lactational anoestrus in the sow. Reproduction Nutrition and Development 35: 395414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19950405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robert, S and Martineau, GP 2001 Effects of repeated cross-fosterings on preweaning behavior and growth performance of piglets and on maternal behavior of sows. Journal of Animal Science 79: 8893CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robert, S, Thompson, BK and Fraser, D 1995 Selective tooth clipping in the management of low-birth-weight piglets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 75: 285289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, JA, Carranca, C, Bland, IM, Sinclair, AG, Ewen, M, Bland, IVC and Edwards, SA 2003 Relationship between passive absorption of immunoglobulin G by the piglet and plasma concentrations of immunoglobulin G at weaning. Livestock Production Science 81: 223234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00260-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosochacki, SJ, Piekarzewska, AB, Poloszynowicz, J and Sakowski, T 2000 The influence of restraint immobilization stress on the concentration of bioamines and cortisol in plasma of Pietrain and Duroc pige. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A. Physiology, Pathology and Clinical Medicine 47: 231242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Nay, TS, Wright, LR, Payne, DC and Foxcroft, GR 1995 Stress and nursing in the pig: role of HPA axis and endogenous opioid peptides. Physiology and Behavior 58: 4348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)00375-FCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J, Foxcroft, G and de Passillé, AM 1993 Nursing-induced changes in pain sensitivity, prolactin, and somatotropin in the pig. Physiology and Behavior 53: 265270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(93)90203-RCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, KMD, Baxter, EM, Ask, B, Berg, P, D’Eath, RB, Jarvis, S, Jensen, KK, Lawrence, AB, Mousten, VA, Robson, SK, Roehe, R, Thorup, F, Turner, SP and SandØe, P 2011 The ethical and welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig: challenges and solutions. Project report 17, Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Copenhagen, Denmark and SAC, Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Donald, RD, Arnott, G, Rooke, JA, Dixon, L, Mettam, J, Turnbull, J and Lawrence, AB 2012 Farm animal welfare: assessing risks attributable to the prenatal environment. Animal Welfare 21(3): 419429. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.3.419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Baxter, EM, D’Eath, RB, Turner, SP, Arnott, G, Roehe, R, Ask, B, SandØe, P, Mousten, VA, Thorup, F, Edwards, SA, Berg, P and Lawrence, AB 2013 The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors. Animal Welfare 22: 199218. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulders, FJM 2009 A practicable approach to assessing risks for animal welfare: methodological considerations. In: Smulders, FJM and Algers, B (eds) Welfare of Production Animals: Assessment and Management of Risks pp 239274. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soede, NM, Laurenssen, B, Abrahamse-Berkeveld, M, Gerritsen, R, Dirx-Kuijken, N, Langendijk, P and Kemp, B 2012 Timing of lactational oestrus in intermittent suckling regimes: Consequences for sow fertility. Animal Reproduction Science 130: 7481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anire-prosci.2011.12.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommavilla, R, Hötzel, MJ and Dalla Costa, OA 2011 Piglets’ weaning behavioural response is influenced by quality of human-animal interactions during suckling. Animal 5: 14261431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spötter, A and Distl, O 2006 Genetic approaches to the improvement of fertility traits in the pig. The Veterinary Journal 172: 234247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.11.013Google Scholar
Stanton, HC, Mueller, RL and Bailey, CL 1972 Adrenal catecholamine levels and synthesizing enzyme activities in newborn swine exposed to cold and 6-hydroxydopamine. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 141: 991995CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, TS and Diekman, MA 1989 Effect of birth and fraternal litter size and cross-fostering on growth and reproduction in swine. Journal of Animal Science 67: 635640CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straw, BE 1997 Veterinary practice: art, science and politics. Proceeedings of the 28th Annual Management American Association of Swine Practitioners p 1. 1-4 March 1997, Quebec City, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Straw, BE, Dewey, CE and Bürgi, EJ 1998 Patterns of cross-fostering and piglet mortality on commercial US and Canadian swine farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 33: 8389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(97)00051-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, BEH, D’Eath, RB, Farnworth, MJ, Robson, S, Russell, JA, Lawrence, AB and Jarvis, S 2008 Early weaning results in less active behaviour, accompanied by lower 5-HT1A and higher 5-HT2A receptor mRNA expression in specific brain regions of female pigs. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33: 10771092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.05.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaker, MYC and Bilkei, G 2005 Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows. Animal Reproduction Science 88: 309318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anire prosci.2004.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theil, PK, Sejrsen, K, Hurley, WL, Labouriau, R, Thomsen, B and SØrensen, MT 2006 Role of suckling in regulating cell turnover and onset and maintenance of lactation in individual mammary glands of sows. Journal of Animal Science 84: 16911698. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-518CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorup, F 2007 Effect of a sow having functioned as a nurse sow. Report number 793, Dansk Svineproduktion Bulletins. http://www.danishpigproduction.dk/Research/Research_report/R eproduction.htmlGoogle Scholar
Thorup, F, Eriksen, L and Risum, D 2004 Predicting piglets at birth with a high risk for mortality. Proceedings of the 18th Congress of the International Pig Veterinary society p 478. 27 July-1 August 2004, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Thorup, F and SØrensen, AK 2006 Use of one step or two step nurse sows for surplus piglets. Proceedings of the 19th Congress of the International Pig Veterinary Society p 105. 16-19 July 2009, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Tölle, K-H and Meyer, C 2008 Schweine aktuell: umgang mit vielen Saugferkeln (Teil 2): Erfahrungen mit technischen Ammen im LVZ Futterkamp. Bauernblatt 15: 3739. [Title translation: Pig news: dealing with many piglets (part 2): experiences with artificial rearers in LVZ Futterkamp]Google Scholar
Tollin, M, Bergsson, G, Kai-Larsen, Y, Lengqvist, J, Sjövall, J, Griffiths, W, Skúladóttir, GV, Haraldsson, Á, Jörnvall, H, Gudmundsson, GH and Agerberth, B 2005 Vernix caseosa as a multi-component defence system based on polypeptides, lipids and their interactions. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS 62: 23902399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5260-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, RL 1974 Parent-offspring conflict. Integrative and Comparative Biology 14: 249264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.249Google Scholar
Tuboly, S and Bernáth, S 2002 Intestinal absorption of colostral lymphoid cells in newborn animals. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 503: 107114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0559-4_12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderhaeghe, C, Dewulf, J, Ribbens, S, deKruif, A and Maes, D 2010 A cross-sectional study to collect risk factors associated with stillbirths in pig herds. Animal Reproduction Science 118: 6268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.06.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dijk, AJ, Jonker, FH and Taverne, MAM 2008 The effect of administration of 2-iminobiotin at birth on growth rates, morbidity and mortality in piglets under farm conditions. Livestock Science 115: 129136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.06.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, AJ, van Rens, BTTM, van der Lende, T and Taverne, MAM 2005 Factors affecting duration of the expulsive stage of parturition and piglet birth intervals in sows with uncomplicated, spontaneous farrowings. Theriogenology 64: 15731590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.03.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Kempen, T 2007 Sports supplements to facilitate parturition and reduce perinatal mortality. In: Garnsworthy, P and Wiseman, J (eds) Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Wagstrom, EA, Yoon, KJ and Zimmerman, JJ 2000 Immune components in porcine mammary secretions. Viral Immunology 13: 383397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/08828240050144699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, JS, Wu, MC, Chang, HL and Young, MS 2007 Predicting parturition time through ultrasonic measurement of posture changing rate in crated Landrace sows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 20: 682692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM and Fraser, D 1995 Calling by domestic piglets: reliable signals of need. Animal Behaviour 50: 10471055. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80105-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM and Fraser, D 1997 Vocal response of piglets to weaning: effect of piglet age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 153160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00066-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM and Fraser, D 1999 Partial tooth-clipping of suckling pigs: effects on neonatal competition and facial injuries. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 2127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00052-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM, Appleby, MC and Fraser, D 1999 Responses of piglets to early separation from the sow. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63: 289300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00021-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM, Jasper, J and Hotzel, MJ 2008 Understanding weaning distress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110: 2441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM, Pajor, EA, Thompson, BK and Fraser, D 1996 Risky behaviour by piglets: a trade off between feeding and risk of mortality by maternal crushing? Animal Behaviour 51: 619624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SA, Aherne, FX, Meaney, MJ, Schaefer, AL and Dixon, WT 2000 Neonatal handling permanently alters hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, behaviour, and body weight in boars. Journal of Endocrinology 164(3): 349359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1640349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, AJ 1998 Objectives and strategies in pig improvement: an applied perspective. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 3646. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70152-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whatson, TS and Bertram, JM 1982 Some observations on mother infant interactions in the pig (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Ethology 9: 253261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(83)90005-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, KR, Anderson, DM and Bate, LA 1996 Increasing piglet survival through an improved farrowing management protocol. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76: 491495. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjas96-075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M 2008 NADIS Pig Health. Savaging of piglets. September 2008 NADIS Health Bulletin. www.nationalbeefassociation.com/extras/nadispigletsavaging.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wootton, R, Flecknell, PA and John, M 1982 Accurate measurement of cerebral metabolism in the conscious, unrestrained neonatal piglet I. Blood flow. Biology of the Neonate 41: 209220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000241553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worobec, EK, Duncan, IJH and Widowski, TM 1999 The effects of weaning at 7, 14 and 28 days on piglet behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 173182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00225-1Google Scholar
Worsaae, H and Schmidt, M 1980 Plasma-cortisol and behavior in early weaned piglets. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 21: 640657Google ScholarPubMed
Young, J 2000 Effects of neonatal handling on sympathoadrenal activity and body composition in adult male rats. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 279(5): R1745R1752Google ScholarPubMed
Yuan, Y, Jansen, J, Charles, D and Zanella, AJ 2004 The influence of weaning age on post-mixing agonistic interactions in growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 88: 3946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurbrigg, K 2006 Sow shoulder lesions: risk factors and treatment effects on an Ontario farm. Journal of Animal Science 84: 25092514. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-713CrossRefGoogle Scholar