Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Free Content Parliamentary petitions and public engagement: an empirical analysis of the role of e-petitions

Download Article:
(HTML 110.1 kb)
(PDF 1,245.7 kb)
Legislatures around the world are experimenting with online petitions as a means of enabling the public to express policy preferences. In some countries they have attracted an extraordinarily large number of signatories, but it is often unclear what, if anything, they achieve. This article addresses this important question through an analysis of the UK parliament’s e-petitions system. Drawing on a review of historical and comparative research, it develops a new analytical framework which identifies four potential types of roles ‐ linkage, campaigning, scrutiny and policy. Our study shows that although a large proportion of e-petitions to the UK parliament are rejected and only a very small number lead to specific action, they nevertheless play important roles. Some have performed campaigning or scrutiny roles, but their primary effect has been to facilitate public engagement.
No References for this article.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: House of Commons; democracy; e-government; e-petitions; parliament; parliamentary petitions; political participation; public engagement

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: ,

Publication date: July, 2019

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more