Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Free Content Basic income: confusion, claims and choices

Download Article:
(PDF 93.5 kb)
Basic Income is gaining increasing prominence. The paper analyses the idea. Six confusions are discussed and suggestions made for greater clarity. Five claims made for Basic Income are considered – that unconditionality is just, that individualised simplicity is fair, that it is economically efficient, that it is compatible with the future labour market, and is politically feasible. All five of these claims are found to be wanting. Some of the choices that must be made in developing policy to reduce poverty are reviewed. The paper concludes that if the aim is to tackle poverty, Basic Income is not the solution.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: basic income; social justice; social security; unconditionality

Affiliations: London School of Economics, UK

Appeared or available online: 23 April 2018

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more