Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Free Content The evidence-based policy movement and political idealism

Download Article:
 Download
(HTML 57.5 kb)
 
or
 Download
(PDF 143.8 kb)
 
The opposing views in the scholarly debate on evidence-based policy (EBP) have recently been labeled ‘rationalist’ and ‘constructivist’, where the former are positive to EBP and the latter are not. This framing of the debate is suboptimal, as it conflates critical positions that should be kept separate. This article suggests that the debate should be understood as one between idealists, realists, and counter-idealists about EBP. The realist position, that is, that EBP is difficult or impossible to achieve in practice, has already been treated at length in the debate. The conflict between idealism and counter-idealism, to the contrary, has been neglected. This article aims to stimulate the scholarly debate on EBP by initiating a principled discussion between idealism and counter-idealism about EBP, which should motivate proponents of EBP to formulate their ideal with substantial moral arguments. This places the debate on EBP in the context of normative political theory, where it rightfully belongs.

18 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: evidence-based policy; idealism; political theory; public policy

Document Type: Discussion

Affiliations: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Publication date: August 2021

This article was made available online on March 18, 2020 as a Fast Track article with title: "The evidence-based policy movement and political idealism".

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
UA-1313315-21
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more