Evidence to support delivery of effective health services: a responsive programme of rapid evidence synthesis
Aims and objectives: To describe and evaluate the review teams’ interactions with the evidence users the programme aimed to serve, primarily NHS clinicians, commissioners and managers. We particularly aim to highlight the barriers and facilitators to the impact that this type of programme may have on the uptake and use of research evidence by decision makers.
Methods: Narrative review of stakeholder interactions at different stages of the review process: prioritisation and defining scope; dealing with unexpected results; dissemination of findings; and measuring impact, illustrated by examples from the first three years of the service (2014‐17).
Conclusions: Timely production of high-quality outputs was facilitated by: initial mapping and scoping of the available published evidence; early engagement with stakeholders to optimise their involvement within limited time and resources; and willingness to consider creative solutions and different ways of working to overcome problems encountered in specific projects.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: University of Sheffield, UK 2: University of York, UK 3: London School of Economics, UK
Publication date: February 2021
This article was made available online on January 18, 2019 as a Fast Track article with title: "Evidence to support delivery of effective health services: a responsive programme of rapid evidence synthesis ".
Evidence & Policy is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to comprehensive and critical assessment of the relationship between research evidence and the concerns of policy makers and practitioners, as well as researchers.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Policy Press journals homepage
- Evidence & Policy fast track articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites