Skip to main content
padlock icon - secure page this page is secure

Open Access Towards a heart and soul for co-creative research practice: a systemic approach

Download Article:
(HTML 84.2 kb)
(PDF 219.6 kb)
The language of co-creation has become popular with policy makers, researchers and consultants wanting to support evidence-based change. However, there is little agreement about what features a research or consultancy project must have for peers to recognise the project as co-creative, and therefore for it to contribute to the growing body of practice and theory under that heading. This means that scholars and practitioners do not have a shared basis for critical reflection, improving practice and debating ethics, legitimacy and quality. While seeking to avoid any premature defining of orthodoxy, this article offers a framework to support researchers and practitioners in discussing the boundaries and the features that are beginning to characterise a particular discourse, such as the one that is unfolding around the concept of co-creation. The paper is the outcome of an online and face-to-face dialogue among an international group of scholars. The dialogue draws on Critical Systems Heuristics’ (Ulrich, 1994) questions concerning motivation (revealing assumptions about its purpose and value), power (interrogating assumptions about who has control and is therefore able to define success), knowledge (surfacing assumptions about experience and expertise) and legitimacy (disclosing moral assumptions). The paper ends by suggesting important areas for further exploration to contribute to the emerging discourse of co-creation in ways that support critical reflection, improved practice, and provide a basis for debating ethics and quality.

21 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Co-creation; Critical Systems Heuristics; boundary critique; participatory research

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Christchurch, New Zealand 2: University of Otago, New Zealand 3: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA 4: University of Hull, UK; Malardalen University, Sweden; University of Queensland, Australia; Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand; University of Canterbury, New Zealand 5: University of Aberdeen, UK 6: Instituto de Ciencia Política, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

Publication date: August 2019

This article was made available online on July 22, 2019 as a Fast Track article with title: "Towards a heart and soul for co-creative research practice: a systemic approach".

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more