Quantifying the discriminatory power of remote sensing technologies for benthic habitat mapping
This study exploits an existing data-rich study site in order to provide guidance for the use of remote sensing technology in regions where such data do not exist already. LiDAR (light detection and ranging) reflectivity, multibeam backscatter, World View 2 (WV2) bands 1–4, multibeam bathymetry, and depth-derived variables are analysed to determine the extent to which they enable benthic habitats of interest to be discriminated from one another in a statistical sense. Ground truth is employed in the form of towed video.
Quantitative results are tabulated for each of the six pairs of four key habitat classes: macroalgae, seagrass, sand, and reef. The technique of Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) is used to calculate ratios of between-class to within-class variation and cross-validated error rate estimates are calculated for the best combination of N variables, where N varies from 1 to 8. It is found that: Reef and Macroalgae classes cannot be statistically distinguished with the technologies and training methods studied here; WV2 augmented with depth provides good discrimination between the separable classes; multibeam echosounder depth and backscatter data both provide good information for mapping cover types, but in general are not as useful as optical data if it is available. LiDAR reflectivity is a very useful covariate, which has comparable discriminatory power to any one of the first three WV2 bands, with the added potential to penetrate to greater depths than the passive satellite sensors.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial, Research Organisation (CSIRO) Data 61, Floreat, Australia 2: Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Research and University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
Publication date: April 3, 2019