Detailed physiological and micrometeorological studies have provided new insights that greatly simplify the prediction of gross photosynthesis (PG) and the fraction of production that goes into above-ground net primary production (NPPA). These simplifications have been incorporated into a process-based forest growth model called 3-PGS (Physiological Principles Predicting Growth with Satellite Data). Running the model requires only monthly weather data, an estimate of soil texture and rooting depth, quantum efficiency (α), and a satellitederived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) correlated with the fraction of visible light intercepted by foliage. The model was originally tested in Australia where seasonal variation in NDVI is extreme. In Oregon, NDVI varies much less seasonally and fully stocked coniferous stands maintain nearly constant canopy greenness throughout the year. We compared 3-PGS estimates of PG and NPPA across a steep environmental gradient in western Oregon where groundbased measurements at six sites were available from previous studies. We first tested the simplification in data acquisition of assigning the same quantum efficiency (α=0.04 mol C/MJ APAR) and available soil water storage capacity (=226 mm) to all sites. With these two variables fixed, the linear relation between predicted and measured PG was y=1.45 x +2.4 with an r2=0.85. When values of were adjusted to match seasonal measurements of predawn water potentials more closely, and the quantum efficiency was increased to 0.05 mol C/MJ absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) on the most productive site, predicted and observed values of PG and NPPA were in near 1:1 agreement with r2=0.92. Because maximum greenness (NDVI) reflects the seasonal availability of water, limits on soil water storage capacity can be inferred from calculated water balances derived following the onset of summer drought. The simplifications embedded in the 3-PGS model, along with the need to acquire only one midsummer estimate of maximum greenness, make the approach well suited for assessing the productive capacity of forest lands throughout the Pacific Northwest, USA.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria, 3169 Australia
Oregon State University, College of Forestry, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA
Australian National University/Landsberg Consulting, 22 Mirning Crescent, Aranda, Canberra ACT 2614, Australia
December 15, 2001
More about this publication?