Finding abstract commonalties of category members
To form a coherent conceptual category and use it for inductive inference, the cognitive system needs to discover commonalties among different objects. How does the system accomplish this task? This study compares two of the most commonly used functions of categories-classification and feature inference-and examines their effectiveness in finding abstract commonalties of category members. The results from two experiments show that a classification task is not very useful for abstraction. In contrast, a feature inference task is advantageous in extracting abstract commonalties. However, this advantage is limited. Finding abstract commonalities becomes burdensome when category labels are absent in the feature inference task. These results underscore the importance of category membership information for abstraction. It is suggested that this advantage comes from the fact that category labels help form structured representation and facilitate structural alignment.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Publication date: September 1, 2009