The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment
Substitution is used within attributional life cycle assessments (LCAs) as a means of avoiding allocation between co-products, and a number of existing standards and guidance documents permit its use in this way. This article discusses the appropriateness of substitution for attributional
LCA, and suggests that the use of substitution introduces consequential elements into attributional analysis and that attributional assessments that use substitution will not be appropriate for consumption-based carbon accounting or corporate greenhouse gas reporting. This article suggests
that, as a methodological principle, attributional LCA should only include actual physical burdens and should not include values for burdens that are avoided (i.e. do not physically occur). We also suggest that existing standards and guidance should be amended so that substitution is not permitted
as a method within attributional LCA and that substitution should be clearly distinguished from expanding the function studied by an assessment. This article focuses on greenhouse gas LCA, but the discussion and conclusions apply to attributional LCA generally.
Keywords: GHG accounting; GHG inventories; corporate inventory; protocols and standards; supply chain
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Ecometrica Ltd, Top Floor, Unit 3B, Kittle YardsEdinburgh,EH9 1PJ, UK
Publication date: 01 December 2011
- Submit a Paper
- Information for Advertisers
- Aims and Scope
- History
- Purchase Institutional subscription
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content